Investigating Iranian EFL Instructor Evaluation Scheme from End-Users’ Perspective: Self-Evaluation vs. Students’ Ratings

سال انتشار: 1397
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 444

فایل این مقاله در 18 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_RELT-6-2_006

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 11 خرداد 1398

چکیده مقاله:

Abstract This study investigated Iranian EFL instructor evaluation scheme from end-users’ perspective: self-evaluation vs. students’ ratings. To do so, in the second semester of 2015-2016, 60 instructors and 1000 students of English Department of Islamic Azad University Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, )IAUIB(, were selected as those from whom the corpus of the study was extracted. The corpus was provided by administrating two rating scales online via the university website on each person’s profile. Then the results of their completed evaluation rating scales were compared. The study was accomplished through a non-experimental descriptive correlational design. The results revealed that almost no relationship was found between Iranian EFL instructors’ self-evaluation and those done by their students at IAUIB. This study could benefit Iranian educationalists, policy makers, and evaluators in making informed pedagogical decisions and conducting more efficient teacher evaluation in English education of Iran.   

کلیدواژه ها:

نویسندگان

Fateme Naderian

English Department, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Isfahan, Iran

Azizeh Chalak

English Department, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Isfahan, Iran

Ahmad Ali Foroughi

Educational Sciences Department, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Isfahan, Iran

Hossein Heidari Tabrizi

English Department, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Isfahan, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Ahmadi, M., & Sajjadi, S. (2009). Who should teach English ...
  • Angelo, T. A. (1996). Relating exemplary teaching to student learning. ...
  • Barton, H., & Shana, N. (2010). Principals perceptions of teacher ...
  • Bascia, N., & Jacka, N. (2001). Falling in and filling ...
  • Boggs, G. R. (1999). What the learning paradigm means for ...
  • Brandt, C., Mathers, C., Oliva, M., Brown-Sims, M., & Hess, ...
  • Centra, J. A. (2003). Will teachers receive higher student evaluations ...
  • Clotfelter, C. T., Ladd, H. F., & Vigdor, J. L. ...
  • Danielson, C., & McGreal, T. L. (2000). Teacher evaluation to ...
  • Delvaux, E., Vanhoof, J., Tuytens, M., Vekeman, E., Devos, G., ...
  • Dunning, D., Meyerowitz, J. A., & Holzberg, A. D. (1989). ...
  • Ellett, C. D., Loup, K. S., Culross, R. R., McMullen, ...
  • Gao, G. (1998). An initial analysis of the effects of ...
  • Harmer, J. (2001). The practice of English language teaching (3rd ...
  • Harvey, J. N., & Barker, D. G. (1970). Student evaluation ...
  • Heine, S. J., Lehman, D. R., Markus, H. R., & ...
  • Hinchey, P. H. (2010). Getting teacher assessment right: What policymakers ...
  • Isoré, M. (2009). Teacher evaluation: Current practices in OECD countries ...
  • Jacob, B. A., & Lefgren, L. (2008). Can principals identify ...
  • Kennedy, M. (2005). Inside teaching. U.S.: Harvard University Press. ...
  • Kitayama, S., & Markus, H. (1999). The yin and yang ...
  • McKeachie, W. J. (1996). Student ratings of teaching. The professional ...
  • Mielke, P., & Frontier, T. (2012). Keeping improvement in mind. ...
  • Palmer, B., & Marra, R. M. (2004). College student epistemological ...
  • Peterson, K. D. (2000). Teacher evaluation: A comprehensive guide to ...
  • Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. (2000). Approaches and methods ...
  • Richardson, J. T. (2005). Instruments for obtaining student feedback: A ...
  • Rigi, A. Ghaderi, M. Salimi, J. (2016). Comparing teachers’ function ...
  • Roessingh, H. (2006). The teacher is the key: Building trust ...
  • Scriven, D. Micael, C. Barbra, G. & Susan, T. (1987). ...
  • Shulman, L. S. (1993). Forum: Teaching as community property: Putting ...
  • Stake, R. (1987). The evaluation of teaching on campus. Unpublished ...
  • Theall, M., Abrami, P. C., & Mets, L. A. (2001). ...
  • Tudor, I. (1993). Teacher roles in the learner-centred classroom. ELT ...
  • Webb, L. D., & Norton, M. S. (2003). Human resources ...
  • Wren, S. (2006). Highly-qualified teachers are not necessarily high-quality teachers. ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع