The Effect of Teacher, Peer, and Self-Assessment on Writing Performance of Iranian Intermediate High School Learners

سال انتشار: 1395
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 370

فایل این مقاله در 16 صفحه با فرمت PDF و WORD قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

ELSCONF04_212

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 19 خرداد 1396

چکیده مقاله:

The present study investigated the effect of teacher-, peer-, and self-assessment on writing performance of Iranian intermediate high school learners. To carry out the research, 69 high school students with the same level ofproficiency- intermediate, from three schools in Darab, Iran were selected out of 111 high school students who took astandardized English proficiency test, Nelson proficiency test. Then, they were randomly divided into one control group whose writings were corrected by the teacher and two experimental groups which received peer-assessment and selfassessment on their writings. Each group had 23 students. Before the treatment, they were given a pretest in the form of a composition. The topic was characteristics of a good student. During the treatment, participants in all the threegroups wrote ten writing samples on different topics for ten class sessions and received teacher-, peer-, and selfassessmentbased on their groups. Finally, all the groups were asked to write about the same topic, characteristics of agood student, as posttest. Then, data were analyzed using mixed between-within subjects’ analysis of variance. Results indicated that teacher-, peer-, and self-assessment had no significant effect on participants’ scores during the treatment. Also, the main effect comparing the three types of assessment altogether was not significant, suggesting no difference in the effectiveness of the three assessment approaches. Moreover, the study has insights and implications for teachers.

نویسندگان

Mostafa Tajgozari

Shiraz University

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Ferris, D. R. (1999). :The case for grammar correction In ...
  • Ferris, D. (2002). Treatment of error in second language student ...
  • Ferris, D., & Hedgcock, J. (1998). Teaching ESL composition: Purpose, ...
  • Fowler, W. S., & Coe, N. (1976). English language tests. ...
  • Jamalinesari, A., Rahimi, F., Gowhary, H., & Azizifar, A. (June ...
  • Kaufman, J. H., & Schunn, C. D. (May 01, 2011). ...
  • Kayler, M.. & Weller, K. (January 01, 2007). Pedagogy, S ...
  • Khonbi, Z. A., & Sadeghi, K. (December 01, 2012). The ...
  • Mo-Ching, M. M., Yin-Cheong, C., Shing-On, L., Peter, W.-. P. ...
  • Nugar, K. (2004). Syllabus 2004. ...
  • Orsmond, P. & Merry, S. (1996). The importance of marking ...
  • Patri, M. (2002). The influence of peer feedback on self- ...
  • Plutsky, S., and Wison, B. A. (2004). Comparison of the ...
  • Rod, P.(2004). Future/self evaluation. Hpp : //manila. cet. middlebury. edu/c ...
  • Sadler, P. _ & Good, E. (January 01, 2006). The ...
  • Shahivand, Z., & Pazhakh, A. (2012). The effects of test ...
  • Siyyari, M. (2011). On the croSS relationship between self/peer assessmen: ...
  • Smith, H., Cooper, A., & Lancaster, L. (2002). Improving the ...
  • Sullivan, M. E, Hitchcock, M. A., & Dunnington, G. L. ...
  • Truscott, J.1996. "The case against grammar correction in L2 writing ...
  • Williams, E. (1992). Student attitudes towards approaches to learning and ...
  • Williams, J. C. (2003). Providing feedback on ESL students; written ...
  • Zarei, A. A., & Sayar Mahdavi, A. (2014). The effect ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع