The direct and indirect effect of corrective feedback in speaking accuracy on L2 learners in Iranian EFL context

سال انتشار: 1395
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 675

فایل این مقاله در 10 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

DSCONF02_146

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 21 شهریور 1395

چکیده مقاله:

The purpose of the current study was to investigate the effects of direct and indirect corrective feedback on Iranian EFL learners’ speaking accuracy. This present research aimed to investigate the differential impact of recast and metalinguistic feedback on speaking performance of EFL learners. To do so, After administering a Nelson test to have a homogeneous sample a total number of 61 EFL learners out of 90 participants who were learning English in Nashre Sokhan Foreign Language Institute in Karaj were selected. Learners ranging from 15 to 40 years old. Then they were randomly divided into three groups. Two classes were assigned to serve as an experimental groups which received direct and indirect corrective feedback, and the other class as control group . For pre and post-tests all groups were given different pictures from the PET speaking test to measure the learners speaking accuracy. This study followed a quasi-experimental design. In order to treatment, These classes met twice a week, each session 120 minutes of instruction. These classes last for 8 sessions in 4 weeks. During the course, the learners as similar as the pre and post test, were given the different pictures to speak; At the same time the teacher tried to correct learners’ errors using different types of feedback. The experimental groups received recast and metalinguistic feedback instruction of speaking while the control groups continued traditional speaking instruction without feedback. The results of the One-Way Anova and Post Hoc Tukey Hsd Test showed that, the experimental groups who received corrective feedback outperformed the control group who did not receive any feedback. In other words, first of all both CF types were effective in post test and secondly between the two CF types metalinguistic feedback was more effective than recast.

نویسندگان

S.Pegah Javadi

Student of University of Takestan, Iran

Bahador Sadeghi

Teacher of University of Takestan, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :