Sensitivity Analysis and Comparison of Safe Mud Weight Using Three Criteria in a Vertical Well

سال انتشار: 1394
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 601

فایل این مقاله در 24 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

CRSTCONF02_409

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 21 شهریور 1395

چکیده مقاله:

Instability of borehole has been one of the most important issues in the drilling industry during years. The Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion is the most frequent criterion used to analyze the stability of wellbores. This criterion ignores the strengthening effect of intermediate stress, so it can’t be used to predict the mud weight window properly. During years, lots of criteria that concern the influence of intermediate stress have been developed. In this paper wellbore stability analysis using Mohr-Coulomb, Mogi-Coulomb and Modified Lade failure Criteria is studied and a comparison between results based on these criteria were done. Results showed that the Mohr-Coulomb failure criteria is more conservative and overestimates the pressure in predicting the safe mud weight window. The Modified Lade failure criterion predicted the critical mud weight closer to the reality and less conservative than Mohr-Coulomb criterion and less unconservative than the Mogi-Coulomb failure criterion. A Sensitivity analysis was done to evaluate the effect of some factors on the predicting the safe mud weight window using the aforementioned criteria. Results showed that in the majority of cases, the maximum horizontal stress had the most effect on the internal wellbore pressure and the Poisson’s ratio using all the criteria had the least effect

نویسندگان

Reza Yusefzadeh

BSc Student at Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran

Rasool Khosravanian

Amirkabir University of Technology, Department of Petroleum Engineering, Tehran

Alireza Mohseni Fesegandis

BSc Student at Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran

Ehsan Vahabzadeh

BSc Student at Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • A.M. Al-Ajmi, R.W. Zimmerman, "Stability analysis of vertical boreholes using ...
  • Single B, Goel RK, Mehrotra VK, Garg SK, Allu MR. ...
  • Ewy RT. We llbore-stability predictions by use of a modified ...
  • Zhou S. A program to model the initial shape and ...
  • Al-Ajmi AM, Zimmerman RW. Relationship between the parameters of the ...
  • A.M. Al-Ajmi, R.W. Zimmerman, "Stability analysis of vertical boreholes using ...
  • Hudson JA, Harrison JP. Engineering rock mechanics: an introduction to ...
  • Fjaer E, Holt RM, Horsrud P, Raaen AM, Risnes R. ...
  • Chang C, Zoback MD, Khaksar A. Empirical relations between rock ...
  • Lama RD, Vutukuri VS Handbook on mechanicl properties of rocks. ...
  • Plumb RA. Influence of composition and texture on the failure ...
  • Zoback MD, Barton CA, Brudy M, Castillo DA, Finkbeiner T, ...
  • Yamamoto K Impl ementation of the extended leak-off test in ...
  • Baumgartner J, Zoback MD. Interpretation of hydraulic fracturing pressuretime records ...
  • De Bree P, Walters JV. Micro/minifra test procedures and interpretation ...
  • Sarda JP, Detienne JL, Lassus-Desss J. Rec ommendations for micro ...
  • Addis MA, Hanssen TH, Yassir N, Willoughby DR, Enever J. ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع