Examining the impact of L2 reading and listening proficiency and task type on scores on TOEFL-iBT writing tasks

سال انتشار: 1395
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 736

فایل این مقاله در 20 صفحه با فرمت PDF و WORD قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

CONFBZRA01_102

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 9 مرداد 1395

چکیده مقاله:

The present study is an attempt to investigate the impact of L2 reading and listening proficiency and task type on scores on TOEFL-iBT writing tasks. It was conducted on four male and female TOEFL iBT candidates getting ready for the exam, living in Iran, and wishful to live or study abroad. They were dealing with TOEFL iBT instruction and further practice and exposure to relevant exercises. After a couple of sessions on TOEFL iBT required skills and practice, they took some tests of listening, reading, and eventually both integrated and independent writing. Their obtained scores were correlated to see if there was any significant correlation. The finding of Spearman correlation analyses indicated that there was no significant correlation between iBT candidates reading and listening proficiency and their independent writing performance, whereas integrated writing was highly influenced by listening and reading ability. In addition, they outperformed in ‘addition’ question of integrated writing rather than ‘comparison’questions. Furthermore, the findings, based on the interview, revealed that time and keyboarding skills were the main challenges for most iBT takers.

نویسندگان

Mojtaba Yaqubi

Ph.D. Student, TEFL Shiraz University

A. R. Ahmadi

Associate Professor, TEFL Shiraz University

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Ary, D. L. C. Jacobs, C. Sorensen. (2010). Introduction to ...
  • Barkaoui, K. (2014). Examining the impact of L2 proficiency and ...
  • Cam Nguyen, L. T. (2015). Written Fluency Improvement in a ...
  • Cho, Y. & Bridgeman, B. (2012). Relationship of TOEFL iBI ...
  • Gallagher, N. (2005). DELTA s key to the Next Generation ...
  • He, L. & L. Shi. (2012). Topical knowledge and ESL ...
  • Lee, I. (2014). Revisiting Teacher Feedback in EFL Writing from ...
  • Lee, Y., C. Gentile., & R. Kantor. (2009). Toward Automated ...
  • Kokhan, K. (2012). D ecision-making : Placement trends and effect ...
  • Larsen Freeman, D. (2009). Adjusting Expectations: The Study of Complexity, ...
  • Malvern, D. & B. Richard, (2002). Investigating acc ommodation in ...
  • Norris, J. & L. Ortega. (2009). Towards an Organic Approach ...
  • Philips, D. (2015). Longman Preparation Course for the TOEFL iBT ...
  • Ruecker, T., S. Shapiro., E. Johnson. & C. Tardy. (2014). ...
  • Song, M.- Y. (2011). Note-taking quality and performance on an ...
  • Spoelman, M. & M. Verspoor. (2010). Dynamic Patterns in Development ...
  • Weigle, S. C. (2002). Assessing Writing. CUP: UK. ...
  • 75 2.50 2.25 2.00 1.75 1.50 1.25 1.00 ...
  • What were your problems while writing for independent task? ...
  • Do you think your reading or listening could influence your ...
  • Was the difficulty level of the actual test higher than ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع