Second Language Writing Theory and Second Language Writing Instruction in Iran: A Mismatched Couple?

سال انتشار: 1394
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 378

فایل این مقاله در 12 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

ELSCONF03_127

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 19 اردیبهشت 1395

چکیده مقاله:

The present study describes an attempt to investigate the extent to which second language writing theories are appropriately applied in writing classes held in Iran. To do this, three different advanced writing classes were carefully observed for one session, and their instructors were interviewed when classes finished. The results showed that although writing instructors were fairly familiar with most of the current theories of second language writing, these theories were not put into practice, and a traditional, grammar-is-prime position dominated the classes. However, because of the small sample size, caution must be applied, as the findings might not be transferable to other classes. So, some cross-country research needs to be done in order to determine whether second language writing theories in Iran are effectively used in writing classes or not

کلیدواژه ها:

sample ، second language writing ، second language writing theory

نویسندگان

Ahmad Izadi

M.A. Student, University of Tehran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Bitchener, J. (2008). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. ...
  • Emig, J. (1983). The web of meaning. Upper Montclair, NJ: ...
  • Ferris, D. R. (1995). Student reactions to teacher response in ...
  • Ferris, D. R. (1999). The case of grammar correction in ...
  • Flower, L., and Hayes, J. (1981). A cognitive process theory ...
  • Friere, P. (1974). Education for critical consciousnes, London: Sheed and ...
  • Fujieda, Y. (2006). A Brief Historical Sketch of Second Language ...
  • Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ...
  • Johns, A. M. (1997). Text, role, and context: Developing academic ...
  • Krashen, S. (1993). The power of reading: insights from the ...
  • Krashen, S. (1998). C omprehensible output? System, 26(2), 175-182. ...
  • Kroll, B. (2001). Considerations for teaching an ESL/EFL writing course. ...
  • Lenneberg, E. (1967). The bio log ica I foundations of ...
  • Min, H. T. (2006). The effects of trained peer review ...
  • Raimes, A. (1991). Out of the woods: Emerging traditions in ...
  • Silva, T. (1990). Second language composition instruction: developments, issues, and ...
  • Straub, R. (2000). The student, the text, and the classroom ...
  • Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 ...
  • Zamel, V. (1983). The composing process of advanced ESL students: ...
  • What is your opinion of writing in relation to other ...
  • Can you elaborate on prewriting, writing, and postwriting as three ...
  • What is the role of grammar in second language writing? ...
  • What do you know about process writing? ...
  • Can you explain what genre approach to writing instruction is? ...
  • What is the relationship between second language writing theory and ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع