The Accuracy of Advanced Pushover Analysis Methods in Estimating of Seismic Responses of Steel Moment Frames

سال انتشار: 1393
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 579

فایل این مقاله در 9 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

ISSS05_072

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 1 آذر 1394

چکیده مقاله:

In recently years, researchers in order to eliminate the shortcomings oftraditional push over analysis have presented different advance push overanalysis methods. These analysis methods import factors such as highermode effect, interaction of modes, changes of structural stiffness duringanalysis and etc, in analysis which don’t exists in traditional push overanalysis. In this study to peruse accuracy of advanced push over analysismethods in estimating of seismic responses of steel moment framestructures, the results of two different advanced push over analysis havebeen compared with the results of nonlinear time history analysis. Byevaluating the results of these comparisons, this result has been obtainedwhich advanced push over analysis that have been used in this study, havenot good performance in estimation of drift angle response of steel momentframes that is important parameter in structural damage. Also, theseanalysis methods in estimation of story shear response had weakperformance and the responses of them were inacceptable.

کلیدواژه ها:

pushover analysis ، nonlinear time history analysis ، shear story ، drift angle

نویسندگان

Ali Kachooee

Phd student, School of civil engineering, semnan university, semnan, Iran

Mohammad Ali Kafi

Asistant professor,School of civil engineering, semnan university, semnan, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Saiidi M, Sozen MA, 1981. Simple non-linear seismic analysis of ...
  • AISC, 2005.Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings .ANSI/AISC 341-05, American ...
  • Antoniou S, Pinho R, 20 04.Advantages and limitatios of adaptive ...
  • ASCE, 20 06.Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures ...
  • ATC, 1996. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings. Report ...
  • CEN. Eurocode-8, 20 03. Design of structures for earthquake resistance. ...
  • Chopra AK, Goel RK, 2002.A modal pushover analysis procedure for ...
  • Fajfar P, GaGperSif P, 1996. The N2 method for the ...
  • FEMA, 2000. Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of ...
  • FEMA, 2005. Improvement of nolinear static seismic analysis procedures. FEMA ...
  • Gupta A, Krawinkler H, 2000. Estimation of seismic drift angle ...
  • Gupta A, Krawinkler H, 2010.Seismic Demands for Performance Evaluation of ...
  • Kim S, D'Amore E, 1999. Push-over analysis procedures in earthquake ...
  • Lopez-Menj ivar MA, Pinho R, 20 04. A review of ...
  • Mehdi P oursha , Faramarz Khoshnoudian, A.S Moghadam. A consecutive ...
  • Mwafy AM, Elnashai AS, 2001. Static pushover versus dynamic collapse ...
  • NIST GCR 10-917-8, 2010. Evaluation of the FEMA P-695 Methodology ...
  • Paret TF, Sasaki KK, Elibeck DH, Freeman SA, 1996. Approximate ...
  • Sasaki KK, Freeman SA, Paret TF, 1998. Multi-mode pushover procedure ...
  • Shakeri K, Shayanfar MA, Moghadam AS, 20 07. An efficient ...
  • Tarta G, Pintea A, 2012. Seismic Evaluation of Multi-Storey Moment-Re ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع