The Comprehensive Exposure Index (CEI) Model for the Assessment of Exposure to Risk Factors of UEMSDS

سال انتشار: 1387
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 2,015

فایل این مقاله در 19 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

IRANERGO01_082

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 28 مهر 1386

چکیده مقاله:

The UEMSDs is a significant problem to ill health and associated costs; therefore, in order to protect workers from disorders produced by risk factors, there is a need to introduce a model for the assessment of risk factors featuring work-related UEMSDs. The CEI model is utilized by taking into consideration ten variables for repetitive tasks. Single and total percentage agreement for any item was obtained higher than 60% and all kappa factors for strength of agreements were gained rather than 0.20. Emphasizing on percentage agreement, most items were either close to or above 60%. All kappa factors for all assessment items gained higher than 0.60 and the test-retest agreements were all statistically significant. In laboratory study, for all tasks and assessment items, the percentage agreements were reached close to and above 60%. In field study, for all assessment items, the percentage agreements were obtained higher than 70%. The Kappa factors for all action levels were above 0.60 and percentage agreements for all action levels were reached to higher than 75%. and intra-observer reliabilities and validity tests’ agreement levels were obtained Inter-observer “acceptable” according to Landis and Koch and Baty et al. classifications. By increasing work experience and submitting training about assessment items, both Cohen’s Kappa analysis factors and percentage agreement were enhanced. The model is found to be sensitive for assessing the interventions and changes in exposure and assessment items before and after ergonomic interventions. The model is also indicated to be highly reliable, valid and applicable for a vast range of tasks and jobs include e.g. weaving and textile industries, manufacturing industries, carpentry, steel industry, post offices, service industry, electronic industry, shopping and marketing, agriculture and farming industry, tailoring & sewing, barberry, bakery, bricklaying, etc. Assessment reliabilities, validities and exposure index applicability’s will be improved with enhancing training and guiding to use the CEI model and elevating experience in making assessment process.

کلیدواژه ها:

Comprehensive Exposure Index ، CEI ، UEMSDs ، Repetitive Tasks ، Ergonomic Risk Factors Assessment

نویسندگان

Najarkola Moussavi

Dept. of Occupational & environmental Health, School of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University (TMU), Tehran, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Nordin M, Andersson G (1997). Mus culoskeletal Disorders in the ...
  • Buckle P, Devereux J (2002). The nature of work-related neck ...
  • Bernard BP (1997). Musc uloskeletal disorders & workplace factors: A ...
  • Putz-Anderson V(1994). Cumulative trauma, a manual for m usculoskeletal disprders ...
  • Hagberg M, Silverstein B, Wells R, et al. (1995). Identification, ...
  • Drury CG (1987). A biomechanical evaluation of the repetitive motion ...
  • Silverstein BA, Fine LJ, Armstrong TJ (1986). Hand-wrist cumulative trauma ...
  • Tanaka J, Mcglothin JD (1993). A conceptual quantitative model for ...
  • Dempsey P G (1993).A critical review of biomechanical, ep idemiological, ...
  • Occhipinti E (1998). OCRA: a concise index for the assessment ...
  • Keyserling WM, Stetson DS, Silverstein B, et al.(1993).A check list ...
  • Moore JS, Garg A (1995). The strain index: a proposed ...
  • Li G, Buckle P (1999). Evaluating change in exposure to ...
  • Waters TR, Putz-Anderson V, Garg A, et al. (1993). Revised ...
  • CEN (1993). Safety of machinery. Human physical performance. Part 3: ...
  • Kilbom A (1994a). Repetitive work of the upper extremities. Part ...
  • Armstrong TJ, Buckle P, Fine LJ, et al. (1993). A ...
  • Karwowski W, Marras WS (1999). The occupational Ergonomics Handbook. CRC ...
  • HSE (1998). Manual handling: Guide on regulations.2" Ed. HSE Books. ...
  • Worksafe WA (2000). Code of practice: Manual handling. Worksafe Western ...
  • Mital A, Nicholson AS, Ayoub MM (1997). A guide to ...
  • EC Council Directive L156, 160, C77 (1994). Official Journal of ...
  • Aresini GA (2000). Regulatory issues in occupational ergonomics. In: Occupational ...
  • Van der Beek AJ, Frings-Dresen MHW (1998). Assessment of mechanical ...
  • Stok SH (1991). Workplace ergonomic factors and tle development of ...
  • Hoogendoorn WE, Van Poppel MN, Bongers PM, et al. (2000). ...
  • Bongers P, Kremer AM, Ter laak J (2002). Are psychosocial ...
  • Simoneau S, St.-Vincent M, Chicoine D (2003). Work-related muscu loskeletal ...
  • Winkel J, Mathiassen SE (1994). Assessment of physical workload in ...
  • Bongers P, De winter C, Kompier M, et al. (1993). ...
  • Winkel J, Westgaard R (1992). Occupational and individual risk factors ...
  • Devereux JJ, Rydstedt L, Kellym V, et al. (2004). The ...
  • Armstrong TJ, Buckle P, Fine LJ, et al. (1993). A ...
  • Li G, Buckle P (1999a). Current techniques for assessing physicai ...
  • Landis R, Koch G (1977). The measurement of observer agreement ...
  • Baty D, Buckle PW, Stubbs DA (1986). Posture recording by ...
  • Ketola R, Toivonen R, Vi ikari-Juntura E (2001). Inter-observer repeatability ...
  • Hindle RJ, Pearcy MJ, Cross AT, et al. (1990). Three-dimen ...
  • Rodgers MM, Tummarakota S, Lieh J (1998). Thre e-dimensional dynamic ...
  • Pearcy MJ, Gill JM, Hindle RJ, et al. (1987). Measurement ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع