Developing Equation Models of Knowledge Management Enablers Framework: A Case of Small and Medium Enterprises in Fars Province, Iran

سال انتشار: 1394
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 949

فایل این مقاله در 13 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

ICEMSS01_362

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 22 مهر 1394

چکیده مقاله:

This study primarily aims to develop structural equation models of knowledge management enablers framework in small and medium enterprises. The study was conducted as an empirical experiment to provide a structural equation model of the factors affecting knowledge management enablers. To this end, following an extensivereview of the literature on knowledge management in general and knowledge management enablers in particular, a number of 300 company managers were selectedas the participants from among a select population of 1151 individuals. The data wascollected from the available documents, by conducting interviews and administering aquestionnaire to the participants. The reliability of the questionnaire was calculated tobe 0.90. The study adopted a non-experimental method and a survey design. In this regard, a structural equation model was developed to explain the factors affectingknowledge management enablers using correlational tests of statistics, both direct and indirect correlations among variables and interactive regression equations in the form of path analysis. The statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS and Lisrel software.The results revealed that the seven variables derived from the four components of knowledge management enablers – culture (collaboration, trust, and learning),organizational structure (formalization and centralization), employees and informationtechnology support – confirmed the accuracy of the developed structural equationmodel. All the variables, except for information technology support, influencedknowledge management enablers at variable intensities both directly and indirectly or interactively. Based on the coefficients of the structural equation model, the subscalesof collaboration and trust exerted the most significant direct effect on knowledge management enablers while other variables including collaboration, employees, learning and the subscales of organizational structure component assumed less importance in this regard. The paper ends with discussion and comparison, conclusion, applicable managerial implications and recommendations for future studies.

کلیدواژه ها:

model ، structural equation ، knowledge management enablers ، small and medium enterprises

نویسندگان

Mansour karami

lecturer in university of applied science and technology in the sham sham production group branch

ali karimi

Master of Business Administration and University Lecturer

seyed ebrahim faraji zadeh

Department of plant pathology, shiraz, Branch, Islamic Azad university, shiraz, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • _ Aghajani, H.A., Hosseinzadeh, S.A.A., & Kiakojori, K. (2008). Explanation ...
  • Alavi, M., & Leidner, D.E. (2001). Review: knowledge management and ...
  • Andersson, T..& Westterlind, T. (2000). Sharing Knowledge Over Company Borders ...
  • Asgari, N. (2005). Investigating the relationship of organizational factors of ...
  • Bazargan, A., et al. (1998). Research methods in behavioral sciences. ...
  • Bennett, R., & Gabriel, H., (1999). Organizational factors and knowledge ...
  • Bhatt, G. (2001). Knowledge management in organizations: examining the interaction ...
  • Chaudhry, A. (2005). Knowledge sharing practices in Asian institutions: a ...
  • Conca, F. J., et al. (2004). Development of a measure ...
  • (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of test. Psych ...
  • Danesh, P. (2006). Process design of customer knowledge management in ...
  • Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working Knowledge. Boston: ...
  • Demarest, M. (1997). Understanding knowledge management. Journal of Long Range ...
  • Fahey, L..& Prusak, L. (1998). The eleven deadliest sins of ...
  • Feldman, D. C. (2004). The devil is in the detail: ...
  • Forcadell, F.J., & Guadamillas, F. (2002). A Case Study on ...
  • Graham, A.B., & Pizzo, V.G. (1996). A question of balance: ...
  • Gupta, A.K., & Govindarajan, V. (2000). Knowledge management's social dimension: ...
  • Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & ...
  • Holsapple, C.W., & Joshi, K.D. (2001). Organizational knowledge resources Decision ...
  • Holsapple, C.W., & Joshi, K.D. (2000). An investigation of factors ...
  • Hooman, H.A. (2002). Statistical inference in behavioral research. Tehran: Parsa ...
  • Humphreys, P., McAdam, R., & Leckey, J. (2005). Longitudinal evaluation ...
  • Hurley, R., & Hult, T. (1998). Innovation, market orientation, and ...
  • Jafari, M., Fathian, M., Akhavan, P., & Jahani A. (2008). ...
  • Kreitner, R., & Kinicki, A. (1992). Organizational Behavior. Homewood, IL: ...
  • Krogh, G., Nonaka, I., & Aben, M. (2001). Making the ...
  • ESCFWA. (2003). Knowledge Management Methodology: An Empirical Approach in Core ...
  • Lang, J.C. (2001). Managerial concerns in knowledge management. Journal of ...
  • L eonard-Barton, D. (1995). Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining ...
  • B. (2003). Knowledge Management Enablers, Processes, an Integrative View and ...
  • Remus, U. (2003). Implementing process-ori ented knowledge management strategies. Journal ...
  • Psarras, J..& Papastefanatos, S. (2002). Knowledge and information management in ...
  • environment. the user agent architecture. Information Management & Computer Security, ...
  • Metaxiotis, K., Ergazakis K., & Psarras J. (2005). Exploring the ...
  • knowledge management: agreements and disagreements in the acad em ic/practitioner ...
  • Takeuchi H. (1995). The Knowledge Creation Company- How Japanese Companies ...
  • Grayson, C.J. (1998). If Only We Know What We Know. ...
  • (1994). A meta-analysis of Cronbachs coefficient alpha. Journal of Consumer ...
  • Montano, B., Liebowitz, J., Buchwalter, J., McCaw, D., Newman, B., ...
  • Sarvary, M. (1999) Knowledge management and competition in the consulting ...
  • Stonehouse, G.H., Pemberton J.D., & Barber, C.E. (2001). The role ...
  • Szulanski, G. (1996) Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer ...
  • Tsui, E. (2005). The role of IT in KM: where ...
  • Ferry, D. (1979). Measuring and assessing organizations. New York: John ...
  • (2005) Organizational knowledge management structure. The Learning Organization, 12 (4), ...
  • Yu, S.H., Young-Gul, K., , & Kim, M.Y. (2007). Do ...
  • KM performance? JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANA GEMENT, 11 (6), pp. ...
  • Zohori, Gh. (1999). Application of social sciences research mythology in ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع