The Effects of Explicit and Implicit Corrective Feedback and Learners’ Uptake

سال انتشار: 1393
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 986

فایل این مقاله در 8 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

ELLTE01_023

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 28 شهریور 1394

چکیده مقاله:

Error correction has played an important role in the development of L2 acquisition. Severalstudies have been conducted to investigate the effectiveness of error correction and correctivefeedback. Two major classification of CF types, namely, implicit and explicit have beenproposed by scholars. Lyster and Ranta (1997) classified CF types into six taxonomies whichhave been the basis of many research studies. It has been the most influential taxonomy in thearea of corrective feedback. This study aims at investigating the effectiveness of CF on L2development and also to find the most effective CF type, namely, explicit and implicit and theireffects on learners’ uptake by reviewing thirty research articles. The results revealed that CF hashad positive effects on L2 development and also explicit CF has been superior to implicit CF andhas resulted in more uptake by learners.

کلیدواژه ها:

نویسندگان

Hamideh Nemati

Department of English, Yazd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Yazd, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Ammar, A., & Spada, N. (2006). One size fits all?: ...
  • Asari, Y. (2012). Types of Recasts and Learners Uptake. Dialogue, ...
  • Burt, M. K. (1975). Error analysis in the adult EFL ...
  • Campillo, P. S. (2004). An analysis of uptake following teacher's ...
  • Carroll, S., & Swain, M. (1993). Explicit and implicit negative ...
  • Corder, S. P. (1967). The significance of learner's error. IRAL ...
  • Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (1998). Pedagogical choices in focus ...
  • El Tatawy, M. (2006). Corrective feedback in second language acquisition. ...
  • Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and ...
  • Ellis, R., & Sheen, Y. (2006). Reexamining the role of ...
  • Fawbush, B. (2010). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback for Middle ...
  • Fukuya, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2002). Effects of recasts on ...
  • Gholizade, R. (2013). The Investigation of Differentil Effects of Recast ...
  • Golshan, M. (2013). Corrective Feedback During Communicate Tasks: Do Recasts, ...
  • Jabbari, A. A., & Fazilatfar, A. M. (2012). The role ...
  • Karimi, M. (2014). The Impact of Teacher's Implicit Versus Explicit ...
  • Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition: ...
  • Lyster, R. (2001). Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction ...
  • Lyster, R., & Saito, K. (2010). Oral feedback in classroom ...
  • Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M. (2013). Oral corrective ...
  • Mollakhan, K., Rasouli, M., & Karbalaei, _ (2013). The effect ...
  • Motahari, M. S., & Manesh, A. G. N. The comparative ...
  • Nassaji, H. (2009). Effects of recasts and elicitations in dyadic ...
  • Panova, I., & Lyster, R. (2002). Patterns of corrective feedback ...
  • Rassaei, E, & Moinzadeh, A. (2011). Investigating the effects of ...
  • Rezaei, S., & Derakhshan, _ (2011). Investigating recast and metalinguistic ...
  • Sato, M., & Lyster, R. (2012). Peer interaction and corrective ...
  • Schmidt, R., & Frota, S. (1986). Developing basic conversationl ability ...
  • Sepehrinia, S., Zarea, A., Moghaddam, M. S., & Nasiri, M. ...
  • Sheen, Y. (2004). Corrective feedback and learner uptake in communic ...
  • Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language ...
  • Zhang, S., & Chatupote, M. (2014). Error Treatment Sequence in ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع