Reinterpreting the Legal Ruling on Marriage of Intersex Individuals in Light of Dynamic Jurisprudence and Comparative Law: A Case Study of Iran and England

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

• American Psychological Association. (2015). Guidelines for Psychological Practice with Transgender ...
• Amnesty International. (2021). The State of LGBTI Rights in the ...
• Ansari, M. (1999). Al-Makasib (The Earnings). World Congress for the ...
• Beh Pajooh, A. (2021). Hoghoogh-e Afrad Daray-e Tanavvo'-e Jensiyyati dar ...
• Carpenter, M. (2018). Intersex Variations, Human Rights, and the International ...
• Council of Europe. (2015). Human rights and intersex people. ...
• Fazli, S. M. (2019). Rereading the Rulings of the Intersex ...
• FRA. (2020). A Long Way to Go for LGBTI Equality. ...
• Greenberg, J. A. (2017). Intersexuality and the Law: Why Sex ...
• Harper, J. (2020). Transgender History and Law in the UK. ...
• Hilli, I. I. (1998). Al-Sara'er (The Secrets). Islamic Publications. ...
• Human Rights Watch. (2020). I Want to Be Like Nature ...
• Ja'fari Langaroudi, M. J. f. (1999). Terminologi-ye Hoghoogh (Legal Terminology). ...
• K., P. U. (2013). Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013, ...
• Katouzian, N. (1999). Hoghoogh-e Madani-ye Khanevadeh (Civil Law of Family). ...
• Mousavi Bojnourdi, S. M. (2016). Qawa'id Fiqhiyyah (The Jurisprudential Rules). ...
• Parliament U. K. (2004). Gender Recognition Act 2004, UK. ...
• Safaei, S. H. (1999). Hoghoogh-e Khanevadeh (Family Law). University of ...
• United Nations. (2019). Born Free and Equal: Sexual Orientation and ...
• World Health Organization. (2015). Sexual health, human rights and the ...
نمایش کامل مراجع