Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy across the Learning Objectives in English Translation Curricula (Research Paper)

سال انتشار: 1398
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 12

فایل این مقاله در 17 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_IJEAP-8-4_009

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 19 آبان 1405

چکیده مقاله:

Developing critical thinking is among the most appreciated objectives in academic programs. The present study examined the undergraduate and graduate English Translation curricula of Iran’s higher education (known as Sarfasl) based on Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy (BRT) to find the degree to which levels of BRT were reflected in the curricula. To this end, content analysis was carried out to determine the frequency and proportion of the objectives associated with knowledge (factual, conceptual, procedural, and metacognitive) and cognitive (remember, understand, apply, analyze, evaluate, and create) dimensions. The results revealed that in both curricula, the proportion of lower-order thinking skills (i.e., remember, understand, and apply) were emphasized more than the higher-order ones (i.e., analyze, evaluate, and create) in general.  The results also showed that the most frequent objective in terms of the knowledge domain was the category of understand in both curricula. With regard to knowledge dimension, conceptual knowledge occurred most often, confirming that acquiring knowledge acts as a benchmark in educational quality assurance for curriculum designers. In addition, it was found that the metacognitive-related categories were mostly missing and understand/conceptual category had a dominant role in both curricula. The findings imply that the existing curricula need to be re-structured to reflect critical thinking including both knowledge and cognitive domains to facilitate learner autonomy.

نویسندگان

Hoda Divsar

Department of English Language, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Agwu, K. K., Ogbu, S. O. I., & Okpara, E. ...
  • Ahern, A. O’Connor, T. McRuairc, G. McNamara, & M. O’Donnell, ...
  • Ahmad, N., Anwar, M. A., Ullahkhan, W., Idris, A. A., ...
  • Alipoor, V. Seifnaraghi, M. Naderi, E. Shariatmadari, A. (۲۰۱۳). Reflection ...
  • Amin-Khandaghi, M., & Pakmehr, H. (۲۰۱۳). Critical thinking disposition: A ...
  • Anderson, L., & Krathwohl, D. A. (۲۰۰۱). Taxonomy for learning, ...
  • Belluigi, D. Z. (۲۰۰۹). Exploring the discourses around ‘creativity’ and ...
  • Birjandi, P., & Alizadeh, A. (۲۰۱۲). Manifestation of critical thinking ...
  • Bloom, B.S. (Ed.), Engelhart, M.D., Furst, E.J., Hill, W.H., & ...
  • Brown, A. L. (۱۹۸۷). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other ...
  • Brown, S., & Brown, M. (۲۰۱۰). Using learning taxonomies as a ...
  • Case, R. (۲۰۰۵). Moving critical thinking to the main stage. ...
  • Divsar, H. Jafarigohar, M. (۲۰۱۴). The evaluation of TEFL curriculum ...
  • Dörnyei, Z. (۲۰۰۷). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford ...
  • Fahim, M., & Shakouri, N.(۲۰۱۲). Critical thinking in higher education: ...
  • Field, A. (۲۰۱۳). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (۴th ...
  • Finney, D. (۲۰۰۲). The ELT curriculum: A flexible model for ...
  • Fisher, R. (۱۹۹۵). Teaching children to think. Cheltenham: Stanley Thornes ...
  • Gordon, M. (۲۰۰۹). Toward a pragmatic discourse of constructivism: Reflections ...
  • Halim U., Epçaçan, C., & Koçak, B. (۲۰۱۰). Assessment of ...
  • Halpern, D. (۱۹۹۹). Teaching for critical thinking: Helping college students ...
  • Hashemian Nejad, F. (۲۰۰۱). Presenting a theoretical framework on CT-based ...
  • Kaffash, H. R., Abedi Kargiban, Z., Abedi Kargiban, S., & ...
  • Kanik, F. (۲۰۱۰). An assessment of teachers’ conceptions of critical ...
  • Luckett, K., & L. Sutherland (۲۰۰۰). Assessment practices that improve ...
  • Marzano, R., & Kendall, J. (۲۰۰۷). The new taxonomy of ...
  • National Curriculum, UK. (۱۹۹۹). Values, aims and purposes. Retrieved June ...
  • Paul, R. W. (۱۹۹۵). Critical thinking: How to prepare students ...
  • Razmjoo, S., A., & Kazempourfard, E. (۲۰۱۲). On the representation ...
  • Razmjou, L., Bonyadi, A., & Haghi, V. (۲۰۱۲).Developing guidelines for ...
  • Razmjou, S. A., & Madani, H. (۲۰۱۳). A content analysis ...
  • Renaud, R. D., & Murray, H. Y. G. (۲۰۰۸). A ...
  • Rezvani, R., & Zamani, G. (۲۰۱۲). Creative thinking as generative: ...
  • Riazi, A. M., & Mosallanejad, N. (۲۰۱۰). Evaluation of learning ...
  • Roohani, A., Taheri, F., & Poorzanganeh, M (۲۰۱۴). Evaluating Four ...
  • Shahabi, M. (۲۰۰۵). Critical thinking: critical education. Social Science Education, ...
  • Stepanek, J. (۱۹۹۹). Meeting the Needs of Gifted Students: Differentiating ...
  • Stephen, C. B. (۲۰۰۸). Teaching and assessing basic concepts to ...
  • Thompson, C. (۲۰۱۱). Critical thinking across the curriculum: Process over ...
  • Yousofi, N., Zamani, G. (۲۰۱۶). A comparative study of TEFL ...
  • Zamanian, M., & Mobashernia, R. (۲۰۱۱). A survey of PhD ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع