Authorial Presence in Applied Linguistics Journals: A Comparative Study of self-mention in Iranian and International Publications (Research Paper)

سال انتشار: 1402
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 2

فایل این مقاله در 17 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_IJEAP-12-4_003

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 19 آبان 1405

چکیده مقاله:

Self-mention markers are important in academic writing to establish the author’s presence, but using them inappropriately can violate writing conventions and compromise professionalism. This study investigates the use of self-mention markers in Iranian and international applied linguistics journals. The analysis was conducted on a total of ۲۲۵ research articles published from ۲۰۱۵ to ۲۰۱۸, including ۱۲۵ international and ۱۰۰ Iranian articles. The study found that self-mention markers were used more frequently in international journals, with ‘I’ being the most frequently- used self-mention marker. In contrast, Iranian journals used self-mention markers less frequently, with ‘we’ being the most-frequently used self-mention marker. The most common function of authorial presence in both contexts was ‘explaining a procedure’, though this occurred more in international journals. ‘Stating results/claims’ was the second most frequent function in both contexts as well, with similar frequencies. The least common function was ‘expressing self-benefits’. Iranian researchers also used authorial presence to state goals/purposes and elaborate arguments less frequently than international authors, but used it more to explain procedures. The study has implications for observing academic writing conventions and expectations of knowledge construction in the humanities. It underscores the importance of recognizing diverse academic traditions in different cultural and linguistic contexts.

کلیدواژه ها:

academic writing ، Author Presence ، International Applied Linguistic Journals ، Iranian Applied Linguistic Journals ، Self-mention

نویسندگان

Mohammad Sadeghian Sourki

Department of English, Faculty of Humanities , University of Zabol. Zabol, Sistan and Balouchestan, Iran

Behruz Lotfi Gaskaree

Department of English, Faculty of Humanities , University of Zabol. Zabol, Sistan and Balouchestan,

Mohammad Doosty

Department of English, Faculty of Humanities , University of Zabol. Zabol, Sistan and Balouchestan, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Ädel, A. (۲۰۲۲). Writer and reader visibility in humanities research ...
  • Atkinson, D. (۲۰۰۴). Contrasting rhetorics/contrasting cultures: Why contrastive rhetoric needs ...
  • Bazerman, Charles and Prior, Paul (۲۰۰۵) ‘Participating in emergent socio-literate ...
  • Belcher, D. (۲۰۰۷) ‘Seeking acceptance in an English-only research world’, ...
  • Biber, D. (۱۹۹۳). Representativeness in corpus design. Literary and linguistic ...
  • Biber, D., & Barbieri, F. (۲۰۰۷). Lexical bundles in university ...
  • Bowker, L., & Pearson, J. (۲۰۰۲). Working with specialized language: ...
  • Çandarlı, D., Bayyurt, Y., & Martı, L. (۲۰۱۵). Authorial presence ...
  • Creswell, J. W. (۲۰۱۲). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative ...
  • Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (۲۰۲۳). Self-mention in L۲ (Czech) learner academic discourse: ...
  • Flowerdew, J (۲۰۰۸) ‘Scholarly writers who use English as an ...
  • Flowerdew, L. (۲۰۰۰). Using a genre-based framework to teach organizational ...
  • Hinkel, E. (۱۹۹۷). Indirectness in L۱ and L۲ academic writing. Journal ...
  • Hinkel, E. (۲۰۰۲). Second language writers’ text: Linguistic and rhetorical features. ...
  • Hyland, K. (۲۰۰۱). Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in ...
  • Hyland, K. (۲۰۰۵a). Meta-discourse: Exploring interaction in writing. Continuum ...
  • Hyland, K. (۲۰۰۵b). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction ...
  • Lin, L., & Evans, S. (۲۰۱۲). Structural patterns in empirical ...
  • McGrath, L. (۲۰۱۶). Self-mentions in anthropology and history research articles: ...
  • Swales, J. (۱۹۹۰) Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research ...
  • Swales, J. M., & Feak, C., ۲۰۱۲. Academic writing for ...
  • Tang, R., & John, S. (۱۹۹۹). The ‘I’ in identity: ...
  • Vassileva, I. (۱۹۹۷). Hedging in English and Bulgarian academic writing. ...
  • Walková, M. (۲۰۱۹). A three-dimensional model of personal self-mention in ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع