Exploring Organizational Deception among Community Nurses in Iran: A Grounded Theory Qualitative Study

سال انتشار: 1404
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 36

فایل این مقاله در 9 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_EBHPME-9-3_006

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 17 آبان 1405

چکیده مقاله:

Background: Although numerous news reports have surfaced regarding morally distressing situations in the workplace, little research exists on the topic of deception by organizational research professionals. Methods: Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, and the relevant text was subsequently extracted and condensed using the method proposed by Strauss and Corbin. This study employed a qualitative grounded theory approach to examine how organizational deception manifests among Iran's Community nurses. The research sample consisted of ۲۹ nurses working at public hospitals in Shiraz, Iran. Results:  Three categories of components affecting the Organizational Deception in Iran's Community nurses were identified. In the open coding stage, ۴۰ concepts were obtained, which were finally reduced to ۱۱ subcategories. Six contributing factors to workplace deception were identified and classified into one of two groups. Under the grouping of personality components, the identified organizational deception included: ۱- antisocial attitudes, ۲- machiavellianism, and ۳- passive-aggressive behavior. The remaining deception factors were categorized as cognitive elements: ۱- seeking material and non-tangible benefits and ۲- coercion in the workplace. The negative consequences of organizational deception were observed at individual (relational and psychological), group (interpersonal and external to the organization), and organizational levels. Moreover, managerial factors (management style) and organizational factors (organizational culture, workplace structure, and working conditions) were found to influence the issue of deception in the workplace. This study revealed the strategies used for deception in the workplace, which can include deception as a means of escape and a manipulative tool for handling information. Conclusions: Deceptive actions by nurses harm not only their colleagues and patients but also the credibility of public sector hospitals, reducing citizens' trust in governments. Policymakers and health sector managers should prioritize ethical practices in their operations and consider preventive measures against deception in the workplace. Given the increased potential for communicable disease outbreaks in the world, the integrity and honesty of nurses worldwide during caregiving situations are critical.

کلیدواژه ها:

Organizational deception ، Strauss and Corbin’s grounded theory ، Information manipulation theory ، Community nurses

نویسندگان

Zahra Solati

Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Humanity and Social Sciences, Ardakan University, Ardakan, Iran

Nahid Amrollahi biuki

Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Humanity and Social Sciences, Ardakan University, Ardakan, Iran

Mehdi Golverdi

Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Management and Accounting, College of Farabi, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Karsh B, Booske BC, Sainfort F. Job and organizational determinants ...
  • Kilduff G, Galinsky AD, Gallo E, Reade J. Whatever it ...
  • Mirivel JC, Tracy K. Premeeting talk: An organizationally crucial form ...
  • Markowitz DM, Hancock JT, Woodworth MT, Ely M. Contextual considerations ...
  • Chen B, Zhu H, Fu H, Han Q, Chen L. ...
  • Adib Hajbagheri M. [Grounded theory research methodology: Theorizing method in ...
  • Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills (CA): Sage ...
  • Creswell JW, Miller DL. Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory ...
  • Abbaszadeh M. A reflection on validity and reliability in qualitative ...
  • Suhonen R, Stolt M, Virtanen H, Leino-Kilpi H. Organizational ethics: ...
  • Leavitt K, Sluss DM. Lying for who we are: An ...
  • Mohbi SF. A qualitative study of victims’ narratives on post ...
  • Taghipour F. A qualitative study of media deception methods and ...
  • Ye Y, Wu L Z, Kwan HK, Liu X. From ...
  • Grover SL. Lying, deceit, and subterfuge: A model of dishonesty ...
  • Schein EH. Learning when and how to lie: A neglected ...
  • Jenkins S, Delbridge R. Exploring organizational deception: Organizational contexts, social ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع