Comparison of the Measurement Uncertainty of Thermoluminescence Dosimeters (TLD-۱۰۰ and GR-۲۰۰) in Clinical Radiotherapy Energies

سال انتشار: 1405
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 22

فایل این مقاله در 8 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JBPE-16-5_002

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 29 مهر 1405

چکیده مقاله:

Background: Accurate determination of individual radiation doses is critical in dosimetry, and international standards emphasize the importance of reporting measurement uncertainties. Neglecting measurement uncertainty undermines the reliability of reported dosimetric values, as emphasized by international standards.Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the measurement of uncertainties in two Thermoluminescent Dosimeters (TLDs)-۱۰۰ and GR-۲۰۰, in the dose range of ۳۰–۱۵۰ cGy.Material and Methods: In this experimental study, we evaluated the measurement of uncertainties in two thermoluminescent dosimeters, TLD-۱۰۰ and GR-۲۰۰, in the dose range of ۳۰–۱۵۰ cGy. The study investigated both random (Type A) and systematic (Type B) uncertainties. Random uncertainties include the non-uniformity of dosimeter sensitivity Element Correction Coefficient (ECC), variability in dosimeter response at zero dose, and repeatability. Systematic uncertainties include the dependence of dosimeter response on radiation energy, radiation angle, nonlinearity of dosimeter response, fading, ambient light effects, and reference calibration errors.Results: The total uncertainty for TLD-۱۰۰ was calculated as ۱۰.۹۹% at a ۶۸% confidence level (۲۱.۹۹% at ۹۵% confidence), while for GR-۲۰۰, it was ۱۳.۶۳% at a ۶۸% confidence level (۲۷.۲۶% at ۹۵% confidence). These values are well below the ۴۲% threshold recommended by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) for personal dosimetry services. Conclusion: The GR-۲۰۰ exhibits higher sensitivity for low-dose radiation detection; however, its greater uncertainty makes TLD-۱۰۰ more suitable for clinical and personal dosimetry applications, where precision and reliability are paramount.

نویسندگان

- -

Department of Physics, Arak University, Arak, Iran

- -

Department of Physics, Arak University, Arak, Iran

- -

Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, Tehran, Iran

- -

Department of Medical Physics & Radiotherapy, Arak University of Medical Sciences & Khansari Hospital, Arak, Iran

- -

Department of Medical Physics & Radiotherapy, Arak University of Medical Sciences & Khansari Hospital, Arak, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Olko P. Advantages and disadvantages of luminescence dosimetry. Radiation Measurement ...
  • Horowitz YS, Moscovitch M. Highlights and pitfalls of ۲۰ years ...
  • Phillips GO, Pedraza JM. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) ...
  • McKeever SW. Thermoluminescence of solids. Cambridge University Press; ۱۹۸۵ ...
  • Horowitz YS, Satinger D, Oster L, Issa N, Brandan ME, ...
  • Jursinic PA. Characterization of optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters, OSLDs, for ...
  • Howell RM, Scarboro SB, Kry SF, Yaldo DZ. Accuracy of ...
  • Amit G, Datz H. Automatic detection of anomalous thermoluminescent dosimeter ...
  • Hu JP, Reciniello RN, Holden NE. Optimization of the epithermal ...
  • Furetta C. Handbook of thermoluminescence. World Scientific; ۲۰۱۰ ...
  • Hosseini Pooya S, Orouji T. Evaluation of Effective Sources in ...
  • Instrumentation IR. Passive integrating dosimetry systems for personal and environmental ...
  • Reciniello R. Assessment of Occupational Exposure Due to External Sources ...
  • Stefanik J. Thermoluminescence dosimetry systems for personal and environmental monitoring ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع