The Camp, the Katechon, and the Mystery of Lawlessness: Legality, Legitimacy, and Emergency Governance in Contemporary Politics
سال انتشار: 1405
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 90
فایل این مقاله در 16 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد
- صدور گواهی نمایه سازی
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
ICLPPI04_002
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 26 مهر 1405
چکیده مقاله:
This article examines the relation between the camp, the state of exception, and the political-theological figure of the katechon in Giorgio Agamben’s analysis of modern power. It argues that contemporary institutions can preserve formal legality while progressively losing substantive legitimacy, especially when emergency measures become durable techniques of government. Drawing on Agamben’s accounts of bare life, sovereign exception, messianic time, and the mystery of lawlessness, together with Michel Foucault’s analysis of disciplinary surveillance, the article develops a conceptual account of how exceptional power is spatialized, normalized, and morally obscured. The camp is treated not merely as a historical institution but as a juridical-political matrix in which law remains formally present while protections are selectively suspended. The katechon names the restraining apparatus that promises security by postponing crisis, yet simultaneously delays judgment on the order’s own injustice. This paradox clarifies how appeals to necessity, survival, and public safety can convert provisional restrictions into permanent arrangements and reduce persons to administratively managed life. The article further contends that legality and legitimacy must remain distinct but mutually responsive: legality without legitimacy becomes organized lawlessness, whereas legitimacy without legal mediation risks arbitrary decisionism. Finally, messianic time is interpreted as a critical practice of rendering oppressive mechanisms inoperative rather than awaiting a chronological apocalypse. Such a practice reconnects law with justice by exposing exclusions, restoring political agency, and reopening historical possibilities that security regimes declare closed. The argument contributes to philosophy of law, political theology, and interdisciplinary studies of emergency governance and human rights today.
کلیدواژه ها:
نویسندگان
Tohid Teymouri
Assistant Professor of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Humanities, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran.