The Gap between Subjective and Objective AI Literacy: Operationalizing AI Maturity in Tehran
محل انتشار: فصلنامه مطالعات پردازش دانش، دوره: 6، شماره: 1
سال انتشار: 1405
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 14
فایل این مقاله در 19 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد
- صدور گواهی نمایه سازی
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
JR_IJKPS-6-1_006
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 22 مهر 1405
چکیده مقاله:
This study examines AI maturity among citizens of Tehran by analyzing the gap between subjective and objective AI literacy as an indicator of cognitive misalignment in engagement with AI technologies. Using a quantitative cross-sectional survey design, data were collected from ۵۰۷ residents of Tehran. Subjective AI literacy was measured using the AILS, while objective AI literacy was assessed through the AICOS, a specialized instrument comprising ۵۱ objective and generative items. Reliability was confirmed using Cronbach’s alpha and KR-۲۰. Data were analyzed using independent-samples t tests, Mann-Whitney tests, Spearman correlation, and paired-samples t tests.The mean score for subjective AI literacy was ۴.۹۹ out of ۷, whereas objective literacy scores across dimensions ranged from ۰.۰۷ to ۰.۱۰ on a ۰-۱ scale. A paired-samples t test confirmed a significant gap between the two dimensions with a very large effect size (dz = ۴.۲۷). The correlation between subjective and objective AI literacy was weak and non-significant (rs = ۰.۰۶۲). Generational analysis further showed that younger respondents (born after ۱۳۷۳) scored significantly higher in subjective AI literacy, but did not differ significantly from older respondents on most components of objective AI literacy. The findings indicate that AI maturity in this population is characterized by a structural misalignment between perceived competence and actual knowledge. Increased access to and use of AI tools has not necessarily translated into conceptual understanding, critical evaluation, or ethical awareness. Advancing AI maturity therefore requires educational and cultural policies that align use with understanding, critical judgment, and realistic self-assessment.
کلیدواژه ها:
نویسندگان
مراجع و منابع این مقاله:
لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :