Short versus Long Cephalomedullary Nails for AO/OTA ۳۱-A۳ Reverse-Obliquity Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures: A Focused Systematic Review
سال انتشار: 1405
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 65
فایل این مقاله در 11 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد
- صدور گواهی نمایه سازی
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
JR_TBSRJ-8-2_002
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 22 مهر 1405
چکیده مقاله:
Objective: To synthesize the A۳-specific clinical and biomechanical evidence comparing short and long cephalomedullary nails and to determine whether current evidence supports routine use of a long nail.
Methods: A focused systematic review was performed using PubMed/MEDLINE through August ۲۰۲۶, supplemented by backward citation screening
Results: Six reports formed the core synthesis: four clinical reports and two A۳-specific biomechanical studies. In the most direct comparative clinical cohort (۱۷۰ patients), short and long nails had similar radiographic healing, non:union:, reoperation, readmission, and mortality; short nails were associated with lower blood loss (۱۱۱.۲ vs ۱۷۶.۷ mL), lower transfusion use (۳۷% vs ۵۵%), and shorter procedures (۱۱۸.۷ vs ۱۴۹.۰ min). Larger reverse-obliquity cohorts published subsequently found no consistent outcome advantage for long implants and recommended short implants when sufficient working length and acceptable reduction are achievable. One cadaveric A۳ model found similar overall construct stiffness with a short PFNA when the fracture remained ۲ cm proximal to the distal locking screw, whereas a synthetic A۳.۳ model demonstrated greater varus-related angular change with the shortest nail than with mid- or long-length nails.
Conclusion: Current clinical evidence is modestly favorable to short cephalomedullary nails for appropriately selected AO/OTA ۳۱-A۳ fractures because major healing and revision outcomes appear comparable while operative burden is lower. Routine long-nail use is not supported for every A۳ fracture. Mid- or long-length implants remain reasonable when distal fracture extension, severe A۳.۳ morphology, displacement, or inadequate short-nail working length creates biomechanical concern. Reduction quality and cortical support remain critical determinants of success.
کلیدواژه ها:
نویسندگان
Abolfazl Ghadiry
Assistant Professor of Orthopedic Surgery, Orthopedic Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran
Mohamadreza Daryaee
Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopedics, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran
Seyed Sadegh Shirdel
Assistant Professor of Orthopedic Surgery, Orthopedic Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran
Sadegh Taheri
Assistant Professor of Orthopedic Surgery, Orthopedic Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran
مراجع و منابع این مقاله:
لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :