Primary Bone Grafting in Comminuted Intertrochanteric Fractures Treated with Cephalomedullary Nails: Biological Rationale, Current Evidence, and Clinical Decision-Making
سال انتشار: 1405
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 77
فایل این مقاله در 12 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد
- صدور گواهی نمایه سازی
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
JR_TBSRJ-8-2_003
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 22 مهر 1405
چکیده مقاله:
Objective
To provide a narrative review of the biological rationale, current evidence, and clinical decision-making considerations surrounding primary bone grafting in comminuted intertrochanteric fractures treated with cephalomedullary nails.
Methods
A focused narrative review was performed using PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Relevant English-language studies and reviews addressing intertrochanteric fracture fixation, fracture healing biology, bone grafting, non:union:, augmentation strategies, and cephalomedullary nail complications were reviewed and synthesized.
Results
The available literature strongly supports the importance of mechanical optimization, including acceptable reduction, restoration of medial support, appropriate implant placement, and construct stability. In contrast, direct comparative evidence evaluating cephalomedullary nail fixation with and without primary bone grafting in acute comminuted intertrochanteric fractures is scarce. Evidence supporting graft use is therefore largely indirect and derives from fracture healing biology, non:union: treatment, revision surgery, and the management of bone defects. These data suggest that while grafts may enhance osteogenesis, osteoinduction, and osteoconduction, routine grafting for all unstable fractures is not currently supported.
Conclusion
Primary bone grafting should not be considered a routine component of fixation for all comminuted intertrochanteric fractures. Mechanical stability remains the principal determinant of :union:. Primary grafting may be considered selectively in the presence of major residual defects, persistent biological disadvantage, or situations in which fracture biology appears compromised despite adequate fixation. The current evidence supports a selective, individualized approach rather than universal graft augmentation.
کلیدواژه ها:
نویسندگان
Sadegh Taheri
Assistant Professor of Orthopedic Surgery, Orthopedic Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran
Seyed Sadegh Shirdel
Assistant Professor of Orthopedic Surgery, Orthopedic Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran
Mohamadreza Daryaee
Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopedics, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran
Abolfazl Ghadiry
Assistant Professor of Orthopedic Surgery, Orthopedic Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran
مراجع و منابع این مقاله:
لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :