Oncology Education in Undergraduate Medical Training: A Review of Educational Approaches, Curriculum Challenges, and Localization Requirements in Iran with a Comparative Perspective on International Experiences
محل انتشار: فصلنامه بولتن آموزش پزشکی، دوره: 7، شماره: 2
سال انتشار: 1405
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 22
فایل این مقاله در 23 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد
- صدور گواهی نمایه سازی
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
JR_MEB-7-2_003
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 21 مهر 1405
چکیده مقاله:
Background: The escalating cancer burden and the pivotal role of primary-care physicians in prevention, early diagnosis, and timely referral highlight the urgent need to reform undergraduate oncology education. This study evaluated undergraduate oncology training in Iran, compared it with international benchmarks, and proposed context-sensitive recommendations for curriculum reform.Materials and Methods: A structured critical narrative review was conducted per the SANRA guidelines. English- and Persian-language sources up to March ۳۱, ۲۰۲۶, were searched across PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, Google Scholar, SID, CIVILICA, and ISC, as well as relevant organizational websites. Two reviewers independently screened studies. Data were synthesized thematically across curricular structure, teaching and assessment strategies, international competency benchmarks (ASCO/ESMO, CanMEDS/EPAs), and sociocultural adaptation.Results: Undergraduate oncology education in Iran is fragmented, compartmentalized across inpatient and subspecialty disciplines, and lacks a longitudinal curriculum map. Major gaps were identified in core general-practice competencies: primary prevention, screening, early detection, oncologic emergencies, cancer survivorship, and structured palliative care. Teaching relies heavily on passive lectures with minimal ambulatory, primary-care, simulation-based, or interprofessional training, and culturally sensitive communication (e.g., breaking bad news using SPIKES amid protective family collusion) is inadequately taught. Assessment remains predominantly knowledge-based, with limited workplace-based tools (OSCE, Mini-CEX, DOPS). International comparisons supported longitudinal cancer education, community-based ambulatory rotations, and competency-driven EPAs.Conclusion: Reforming undergraduate oncology education in Iran requires a longitudinal, competency-based, integrated curriculum aligned with primary healthcare needs. Strategic priorities include formulating national core oncology EPAs, expanding ambulatory and community-based exposure, embedding palliative and supportive care, integrating simulation for complex communication, and deploying programmatic, workplace-based assessments.
کلیدواژه ها:
نویسندگان
- -
Medical Oncologist, Hematologist, and Stem Cell Transplantation Specialist, Department of Hematology and Oncology, Imam Reza Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.