Manufacturer-Financed Enabling Services as Instruments of Access: Welfare and Market-Access Implications

سال انتشار: 1404
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 23

فایل این مقاله در 43 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JRMA-11-19_041

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 19 مهر 1405

چکیده مقاله:

This paper investigates the microeconomic mechanisms, welfare implications, and antitrust dimensions of manufacturer-financed enabling services—complementary investments such as dedicated technical instruction, localized physical infrastructure, proprietary digital integration, and subsidized trade credit underwritten by upstream capital goods manufacturers. While conventional industrial organization theory evaluates vertical tying primarily through the analytical priors of double marginalization mitigation or competitive foreclosure, this framework assumes that complementary service and financing markets clear independently. In capital-deficient environments, fragmented supply chains, and emerging technology sectors, however, severe credit rationing and acute verification frictions cause decentralized third-party capital markets to collapse entirely. We develop a microeconomic vertical contracting model featuring a durable goods manufacturer and a continuum of credit-constrained downstream adopters with heterogeneous productivity. The analysis establishes that when commercial financial frictions induce missing-market failures, upstream manufacturers leverage structural monitoring advantages, lower salvage costs, and operational scope economies to underwrite enabling bundles, expanding the extensive margin of downstream market access and generating second-degree Pareto improvements. Yet, in dynamic settings, these same investments can generate severe asymmetric asset specificity, non-portable telemetry, and downstream switching costs that foreclose more efficient upstream rivals. As static market-expansion gains systematically clash with dynamic allocative foreclosure losses, per se unbundling rules risk chilling market creation, whereas blanket antitrust immunity entrenches proprietary lock-in; we conclude that competition authorities must replace static tying doctrines with a dynamic contestability standard conditioning regulatory safe harbors on strict technical interoperability and data portability.

نویسندگان

KIMIA ABDOLMALEKI

Full-time Research Faculty Member Health Studies Research Center SPNT Iranian Institute of Education – Tehran/ Iran