A Practical Roadmap for Mitigating the Destructive Effects of Favoritism in Organizations: Thematic Analysis and Prioritization of Strategies" >A Practical Roadmap for Mitigating the Destructive Effects of Favoritism in Organizations: Thematic Analysis and Prioritization of Strategies" >A Practical Roadmap for Mitigating the Destructive Effects of Favoritism in Organizations: Thematic Analysis and Prioritization of Strategies" >

<span lang="EN">A Practical Roadmap for Mitigating the Destructive Effects of Favoritism in Organizations: Thematic Analysis and Prioritization of Strategies

سال انتشار: 1405
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 29

فایل این مقاله در 31 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JMSMO-3-2_006

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 18 مهر 1405

چکیده مقاله:

Purpose: Favoritism, as a destructive organizational phenomenon, negatively affects opportunity allocation, recruitment, promotion, and employees' perceptions of justice. The existing literature predominantly focuses on consequences and fails to provide an integrated, prioritized picture of countermeasures. This study aims to identify, integrate, and prioritize strategies for mitigating the destructive effects of favoritism in organizations and to develop a practical roadmap.Methodology: This study is applied in purpose and employs a sequential exploratory mixed-methods design. In the qualitative phase, ۱۴۷ articles published between ۲۰۱۵ and ۲۰۲۶ were analyzed using Braun and Clarke's (۲۰۰۶) thematic analysis. In the quantitative phase, the extracted themes were evaluated through a ranking Delphi procedure involving ۱۴ experts and ranked based on importance, feasibility, and effectiveness. Expert consensus was assessed using Kendall's coefficient of concordance.Findings: Eight final themes were organized under the overarching theme of "Establishing Anti-Favoritism Organizational Governance." The top priority was "Establishing a Meritocratic System and Ensuring Equal Opportunity" (mean rank = ۱.۴۳), followed by "Managing Conflicts of Interest" (۲.۶۴), "Transparency and Traceability of HR Decisions" (۲.۹۳), and "Reducing Discretionary Authority" (۳.۲۹). Kendall's coefficient of concordance (۰.۲۸۹; χ² = ۲۸.۳۳; p < ۰.۰۰۱) was statistically significant.Conclusion: Sustainable counteraction against favoritism requires reforming the organizational decision-making architecture rather than merely adopting reactive measures. Meritocracy, conflict-of-interest management, transparency, and the reduction of discretionary authority should be positioned at the core of reforms, while ethical leadership, oversight, reporting mechanisms, and technology function as supporting layers.

کلیدواژه ها:

Favoritism ، Nepotism ، Cronyism ، meritocracy ، Anti-Favoritism Organizational GovernanceThis response is AI-generated ، for reference only

نویسندگان

Akbar Zeiolabedini

PhD in Human Resource Management, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

Alireza Morovati

PhD in Human Resource Management, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Abdelghani, A. A., Fayyad, S., Khairy, H. A., & Ahmed, ...
  • Khan, M. A., Du, J., Fatima, T., Waqas, M., Anwar, ...
  • Schilpzand, P., Lagios, C., & Restubog, S. L. (۲۰۲۴). Family ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع