Competing models of AI statecraft: Techno-nationalism, governance divergence, and the India-China rivalry in the emerging global AI order, ۲۰۲۰-۲۰۲۶

سال انتشار: 1406
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 18

فایل این مقاله در 33 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JCSS-11-1_018

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 18 مهر 1405

چکیده مقاله:

Background: Artificial intelligence has emerged as a general-purpose technology reshaping economic competitiveness, military capability, public administration, and normative order. Between ۲۰۲۰ and ۲۰۲۶, the intensifying competition between India and China has become a defining feature of this global transformation.Aims: This article argues that the India-China AI rivalry transcends mere technical metrics, such as research output or compute capacity, to represent a clash between contrasting models of AI statecraft.Methodology: Drawing on techno-nationalism, neo-realism, and policy-diffusion theory, this study demonstrates that while both nations treat AI as a strategic asset, they organize its development through fundamentally distinct institutional architectures and normative commitments.Findings: China’s approach is characterized by centralized coordination, long-horizon industrial policy, civil-military fusion, and the systematic construction of a sovereign AI ecosystem spanning data, standards, and deployment. Conversely, India’s model, articulated through frameworks like #AIForAll and the IndiaAI Mission, prioritizes inclusive innovation, ethical accountability, digital public infrastructure, and developmental applications. China’s quantitative leadership in scale and infrastructure is tempered by concerns regarding international trust and regulatory legitimacy. Meanwhile, India’s strengths in human capital and ethical framing remain constrained by fragmentation and commercialization gaps. The rivalry carries implications far beyond bilateral relations: it shapes the menu of governance models available to the Global South and influences the evolution of global AI norms, standards, and technological autonomy.Conclusion: By situating this competition within a comparative institutional analysis, the article contributes to scholarship on emerging-technology geopolitics, sovereign AI, and the politics of digital infrastructure in the Indo-Pacific.

نویسندگان

- -

Department of South, East Asian & Oceanian Studies, Faculty of World Studies, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

- -

Department of South, East Asian & Oceanian Studies, Faculty of World Studies, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Al-Marzouqi, A.H. & Arabi, A.A. (۲۰۲۴). “A comparative analysis of ...
  • Bishnoi, P. (۲۰۲۶). “Emerging threat vectors: Drones and autonomous systems ...
  • Bose, J. (۲۰۲۶). “Toward an Indian sovereign AI strategy: Lessons ...
  • Chadha, S.S. (۲۰۲۶). Threading the Needle: India’s Path forward with ...
  • (۲۰۲۴). Negotiating the India-China Standoff: ۲۰۲۰–۲۰۲۴. Carnegie Endowment for International ...
  • Chen, J.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, T. & Ouyang, Z. (۲۰۲۰). ...
  • Cyberspace Administration of China, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, ...
  • Fong, C. (۲۰۲۵). The China-India Relationship: Between Cooperation and Competition. ...
  • Ganaie, N.A.; Senthil Kumar, A.V.; Mir, T.A. & Sambasiva Rao, ...
  • Hu, H.; Wang, D. & Deng, S. (۲۰۲۰). “Global collaboration ...
  • Kamaruddin, S.; Ikhsan, M.I. & Nautiyal, N.S. (۲۰۲۶). “AI and ...
  • Kataria, V.; Khan, S.A. & Gupta, S. (۲۰۲۵). “Leveraging AI ...
  • Kewalramani, M. (۲۰۲۶). Between rivalry and Rapprochement: The Trials and ...
  • Klair, B.G. (۲۰۲۶). Innovation Management for Defence Superiority: The Indigenisation ...
  • Kumar, A. (۲۰۲۱). National AI Policy/Strategy of India and China: ...
  • Leandro, F.J. & Oberoi, R. (۲۰۲۳). “Ukraine geopolitical European flashpoints ...
  • Madan, T. (۲۰۲۰). Managing China: Competitive Engagement with Indian Characteristics. ...
  • Ministry of Education. (۲۰۱۸). “Notice of the People’s Republic of ...
  • Mishra, S.; Srivastava, P. & Pandey, B.N. (۲۰۲۶). “Reimagining India’s ...
  • Mohan, C.R. (۲۰۲۱). Lessons from History: India and China. Oxford ...
  • MOST: Ministry of Science and Technology. (۲۰۱۷). Next Generation of ...
  • Mozaffari Falarti, M. (۲۰۲۴). “Dominating India’s Ratnakara: Sino-Indian conflict in ...
  • NITI Aayog. (۲۰۱۸). National Strategy for Artificial Intelligence: AIForAll. Government ...
  • Office of the Principal Scientific Adviser to the Government of ...
  • Othman, A. (۲۰۲۴). “Asia’s AI future demands India-China synergy, not ...
  • Saalman, L. (۲۰۲۶). AI in Chinese, Indian and US Nuclear ...
  • Satyadhar, J. (۲۰۲۶). “Securing U.S. leadership in agentic AI literacy ...
  • Sazmand, B. & Amini Jeshvaghani, A. (۲۰۲۶). “AI-based policymaking in ...
  • Singh, M.P. & Kumar, R. (۲۰۲۵). “From AI for all ...
  • State Council of the People’s Republic of China. (۲۰۲۵). “Guideline ...
  • Tran, H.C. (۲۰۲۶). “Brokerage in the black box: Swing states, ...
  • Truby, J.; Dahdal, A.; Brown, R. & Ibrahim, I. (۲۰۲۶). ...
  • United Service Institution of India. (۲۰۲۶). Cognitive Warfare by China ...
  • Vaishya, R.; Gupta, B.M.; Sab, C.M.; Guechairi, S.; Vaish, A. ...
  • Wang, X. & Dong, M. (۲۰۲۶). “Bibliometric visualization analysis of ...
  • Wang, S.; Zhang, Y.; Xiao, Y. & Liang, Z. (۲۰۲۵). ...
  • Zhang, M.Y.; Wang, S.; Wei, Y. & Chen, Z. (۲۰۲۶). ...
  • Zhang, P.; Jayakar, K.; Taylor, R. & Liu, C. (۲۰۲۵). ...
  • Zhu, R.; Feng, Z. & Chen, Q. (۲۰۲۲). “Competition of ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع