The Relationship between Ethical Orientations and Tendency to Commit Research Violations with the Moderating Role of Individual Independence
محل انتشار: فصلنامه تاملات اخلاقی، دوره: 7، شماره: 3
سال انتشار: 1405
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 17
فایل این مقاله در 29 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد
- صدور گواهی نمایه سازی
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
JR_JER-7-3_004
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 17 مهر 1405
چکیده مقاله:
The present study aimed to examine the relationship between ethical orientations and the propensity for research misconduct, with the moderating role of individual autonomy, among graduate accounting students and graduates in Iran. This study employed a descriptive-correlational research design. The statistical population consisted of master's and doctoral students and graduates in accounting across the country. A total of ۱۷۴ participants were selected through convenience sampling. Data were collected using standardized questionnaires. The study was conducted in ۲۰۲۴. The proposed research model, comprising four hypotheses, was analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) with SmartPLS software. The findings indicated that consequentialist ethical orientation was negatively and significantly associated with the propensity for research misconduct among graduate accounting students and graduates. Likewise, deontological ethical orientation showed a significant negative relationship with the propensity for research misconduct. Furthermore, individual autonomy played a significant moderating role by strengthening the negative relationships between ethical orientations and the propensity for research misconduct. In other words, higher levels of individual autonomy intensified the inhibitory effects of both ethical orientations on the propensity for research misconduct. These findings highlight the importance of fostering ethical orientations and promoting individual autonomy as complementary mechanisms for reducing the propensity for research misconduct. Strengthening these factors may contribute to enhancing the integrity, credibility, and trustworthiness of academic research and, consequently, support the advancement of scientific knowledge.
کلیدواژه ها:
نویسندگان
Hossein Rajabdorri
Postdoc in Accounting, Vice-Chancellor for Development, Resource Management and Planning, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran.
مراجع و منابع این مقاله:
لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :