Identification and Prioritization of Evaluation Indicators for Rescue and Relief Operations in Crisis: A Case Study of the Iranian Red Crescent Society
محل انتشار: مجله تروما، دوره: 31، شماره: 3
سال انتشار: 1405
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 35
فایل این مقاله در 10 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد
- صدور گواهی نمایه سازی
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
JR_TRAUM-31-3_003
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 17 مهر 1405
چکیده مقاله:
Introduction: Rescue and relief operations are a critical component of crisis response, where efficiency and effectiveness can directly reduce human casualties and enhance community resilience. However, systematic frameworks and standardized indicators for evaluating the performance of crisis management organizations face several challenges. This study aimed to identify and prioritize key standardized criteria and indicators for assessing rescue and relief operations within the Iranian Red Crescent Society (IRCS).Method: A descriptive mixed-methods study was conducted in two sequential phases, qualitative and quantitative, in ۲۰۲۵. The study population consisted of experts employed by the IRCS, among whom ۳۴ participants were selected through purposive sampling. For the qualitative phase, content analysis was employed, while the quantitative phase utilized multi-criteria decision-making methods, including the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS).Result: In the qualitative phase, based on expert evaluation, ۵۸ key indicators were prioritized (۱۷ input indicators, ۱۱ efficiency indicators, ۱۵ effectiveness indicators, and ۱۵ impact indicators. The highest scores were assigned to the following indicators: deployment level of information and communication systems (score: ۰.۸۸۶) under the input dimension; time required to activate early warning systems (score: ۱.۰۰۰) under the efficiency dimension; number of specialized teams organized (e.g., high-altitude rescue, medical, firefighting) (score: ۰.۸۷۲) under the effectiveness dimension; and number of post-incident performance analysis reports (score: ۱.۰۰۰) under the impact dimension.Conclusion: The standardized criteria and key indicators across the four dimensions of inputs, efficiency, effectiveness, and impact can provide a comprehensive structural framework for analyzing rescue and relief operations. This framework can enhance organizational performance, improve operational readiness, increase transparency and accountability, and build public trust in responsible institutions. It is recommended that operational activities be monitored based on this framework to support learning, improvement, and capacity building for community resilience, with further development of composite indicators and integration of innovative technologies.
کلیدواژه ها:
Performance Evaluation ، Rescue and Relief ، Efficiency and Effectiveness Indicators ، crisis management
نویسندگان
Mazyar Karamali
Health Management Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Azadeh Soleimaninejad
Department of Business Management and Entrepreneurship, Faculty of Management, Farabi College, University of Tehran, Iran
PirHossein Kolivand
Department of Health Economics, Faculty of Medicine, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran.
Taher Doroudi
Research Center for Health Management in Mass Gathering, Red Crescent Society of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammadkarim Bahadori
Health Management Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran