Probabilistic Collapse Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Moment Frames Retrofitted with Buckling-Restrained Braces in Eccentric Configurations under Near-Fault Ground Motions" >Probabilistic Collapse Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Moment Frames Retrofitted with Buckling-Restrained Braces in Eccentric Configurations under Near-Fault Ground Motions" >Probabilistic Collapse Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Moment Frames Retrofitted with Buckling-Restrained Braces in Eccentric Configurations under Near-Fault Ground Motions" >

<span lang="EN-GB">Probabilistic Collapse Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Moment Frames Retrofitted with Buckling-Restrained Braces in Eccentric Configurations under Near-Fault Ground Motions

سال انتشار: 1405
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 93

فایل این مقاله در 18 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_RCD-1-3_004

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 14 مرداد 1405

چکیده مقاله:

Existing reinforced concrete (RC) moment-resisting frames designed to pre-modern seismic codes often lack adequate lateral stiffness and ductility, rendering them vulnerable to collapse during strong earthquakes. While buckling-restrained braces (BRBs) are an efficient retrofit due to their stable hysteretic behavior, their application in eccentric configurations (E-BRB) to RC frames remains largely unexplored from a probabilistic collapse perspective. This study presents a seismic collapse evaluation of RC moment frames retrofitted with E-BRBs using the FEMA P۶۹۵ methodology. Three archetype buildings of ۴, ۸, and ۱۲ storeys were designed for two BRB lateral-force participation levels (۵۰% and ۱۰۰% of design base shear). Detailed nonlinear finite element models were developed in PERFORM-۳D, incorporating distributed plasticity, cyclic degradation, and P–Δ effects, and subjected to incremental dynamic analysis using ۲۷ near-fault ground motions (۱۴ pulse-like, ۱۳ non-pulse). Collapse fragility curves were generated, and the adjusted collapse margin ratio (ACMR) was compared against FEMA P۶۹۵ criteria. Results show that the E-BRB retrofit substantially enhances lateral stiffness, ductility, and collapse capacity. Under pulse-like motions, the median collapse spectral acceleration for the ۴-storey frame increased by ۸۸%, and the collapse probability at the Maximum Considered Earthquake level fell from over ۹۹% in the bare frame to negligible values. All retrofitted configurations satisfied FEMA P۶۹۵ requirements, with ACMR values two to three times acceptance thresholds. The system proved particularly effective against near-fault pulses, confirming its potential as a reliable, code-conforming retrofit strategy for RC buildings in high-seismicity regions.

نویسندگان

- -

Civil Engineering Department, Academic Center for Education, Culture and Research, Khuzestan, Iran

- -

Civil Engineering Department, Academic Center for Education, Culture and Research, Khuzestan, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • A. Chopra and L. Jann, “Nonlinear seismic behavior of reinforced ...
  • S. Sugano and M. Fujimura, “A seismic strengthening of existing ...
  • L. Di Sarno and A. S. Elnashai, “Bracing systems for ...
  • R. M. Maheri and H. Ghaffarzadeh, “Connection overstrength in steel-braced ...
  • M. Wakabayashi, T. Nakamura, T. Morishita, and H. Iwai, “Experimental ...
  • A. Watanabe, Y. Hitomi, E. Saeki, A. Wada, and M. ...
  • C. M. Uang and M. Nakashima, “Steel buckling-restrained braced frames,” ...
  • F. Freddi, J. E. Padgett, and A. Dall’Asta, “A life ...
  • P. Castaldo, E. Tubaldi, F. Selvi, and L. Gioiella, “Seismic ...
  • Y. Ouyang, X. Lu, Y. Bai, and Y. Wang, “Seismic ...
  • V. Mohsenian, I. Hajirasouliha, and A. Nikkhoo, “Multi-level response modification ...
  • A. Jalaeefar and A. M. Oveisi, “Investigation of the performance ...
  • S. S. Mousavi, H. Azizi, J. Ahmadi, K. Nasserasadi, and ...
  • G. S. Prinz and P. W. Richards, “Seismic performance of ...
  • A. Rahimi and R. M. Maheri, “The effects of steel ...
  • P. K. Malhotra, “Response of buildings to near-field pulse-like ground ...
  • G. P. Mavroeidis and A. S. Papageorgiou, “A mathematical representation ...
  • T. Okazaki, M. D. Engelhardt, M. Nakashima, and K. Suita, ...
  • E. P. Popov, J. M. Ricles, and K. Kasai, “Methodology ...
  • A. Rahimi and R. M. Maheri, “The effects of retrofitting ...
  • H. Abou-Elfath, M. Ramadan, and F. O. Alkanai, “Upgrading the ...
  • Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Quantification of Building Seismic Performance ...
  • Computers and Structures, Inc. (CSI), PERFORM-۳D: Nonlinear Analysis and Performance ...
  • S. A. Mahin, P. Uriz, I. Aiken, C. Field, and ...
  • A. Wada, E. Saeki, T. Takeuchi, and A. Watanabe, “Development ...
  • A. Niroomandi, A. Maheri, M. R. Maheri, and S. S. ...
  • F. Freddi and F. Gutiérrez-Urzúa, “Influence of design objectives on ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع