The Response of Canola (Brassica napus L.) Cultivars to Different Soil K/Mg Ratios in Greenhouse Conditions

سال انتشار: 1405
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 61

فایل این مقاله در 13 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_ATIC-6-2_007

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 13 مرداد 1405

چکیده مقاله:

To investigate the effects of different levels of available potassium (K) and magnesium (Mg), and their interactions, on the growth characteristics of canola cultivars, a factorial experiment was conducted using a completely randomized design (CRD) with three replications in a pot culture. The first factor consisted of five combinations of the K to Mg ratio (existing conditions, ۸۰%, ۹۰%, ۱۱۰%, and ۱۲۰% of the existing condition) by adding potassium or magnesium sulfate. The concentration of available K+ and Mg۲+ in the existing conditions of soil was ۲۳۷ and ۲۰۶ mg kg-۱, respectively (K+/Mg۲+ ratio ۱.۱۵). The second factor included three canola cultivars (Zafar, Dalgan, and Hyola۵۰). After eight weeks (prior to flowering), the plants were harvested and shoot dry weight (SDW), the concentration of K, Mg, sodium (Na), and calcium (Ca) in the soil, shoots, and roots were measured. Based on the results, the Hyola۵۰ cultivar preferred further amounts of K+ to Mg۲+ (۱۱۰%). Still, the Dalgan cultivar preferred higher amounts of Mg۲+ (۹۰%) (۱۰.۸ and ۹.۶ gr pot-۱ SDW, respectively, for Hyola۵۰ and Dalgan). The highest K concentrations in the shoots of the Dalgan (۵.۱۰%) and Zafar (۴.۴%) cultivars were observed at the ۱۲۰% ratio. The K concentration in the roots of all cultivars (۰.۹۲۸%) was lower than that in the shoots (۴.۱۳%). The Hyola۵۰ cultivar demonstrated a greater need for K+ than Mg۲+ in the soil and was found to be less K-efficient compared to the Dalgan and Zafar cultivars. It is not suggested to maintain a consistent K+/Mg۲+ ratio in the soil for all canola cultivars.

کلیدواژه ها:

نویسندگان

Fereydun Nourgholipour

Department of Soil Fertility and Plant Nutrition, Soil and Water Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran

Mehrsa Ghavamipour

Department of Soil Science and Engineering, University College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran

Hossein Mirseyed Hosseini

Department of Soil Science and Engineering, University College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran

Yaaghoob Hosseini

Department of Soil Fertility and Plant Nutrition, Fars Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Shiraz, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Ahmed A., Ali F., Ali A., Ullah A., Naz R., ...
  • Farahani S., Shahsavari N., Mohammadi Arasteh M. ۲۰۲۰. Effect of ...
  • Page A.L. ۱۹۸۲. Methods of soil analysis: Part ۲. Chemical ...
  • Rawat J., Pandey N., Saxena J. ۲۰۲۲. Role of potassium ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع