Micellar Enhanced Ultrafiltration (MEUF) Using Cetylpyridinium Chloride (CPC) and Hexadecyltrimethylammonium Bromide (HDTAB) Surfactants for Fluoride Rejection: Modeling andProcess Optimization

سال انتشار: 1405
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 22

فایل این مقاله در 8 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JAEHR-14-1_008

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 16 تیر 1405

چکیده مقاله:

Introduction: The current study aimed to optimize micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration (MEUF), a low-pressure membrane method, for removing fluoride from water, a contaminant linked to serious health risks such as fluorosis-through two cationic surfactants.Methods: In this study, a dead-end ultrafiltration system was employed to remove fluoride using cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) and hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (HDTAB). Important operational parameters such as pH (۴-۱۰), initial fluoride concentration (۴-۱۰ mg/L), and surfactant concentration (۰.۵-۱.۵ mM) were modeled and optimized via Response Surface Methodology (RSM) based on a Box-Behnken design.Results: Analysis of variance (ANOVA) confirmed the high significance of the developed quadratic models, with regression coefficients (R۲) of ۰.۹۹ and ۰.۹۷ for CPC and HDTAB, respectively. The optimal removal efficiencies were ۹۴.۵% for CPC (at pH ۸, ۱.۲ mM CPC, ۸ mg/L F-) and ۸۹.۶% for HDTAB (at pH ۷, ۱.۴ mM HDTAB, ۱۰ mg/L F-). Under the optimum conditions, flux values of ۲۶۸.۱ L/m۲.h and ۲۷۶.۵ L/m۲.h were also obtained for CPC and HDTAB, respectively.Conclusion: It was found that MEUF is an effective technique for fluoride rejection. And the RSM successfully modeled and optimized the process, with CPC demonstrating superior performance and model predictability compared to HDTAB. These observations suggest that the proposed system can be reliably applied to larger-scale fluoride removal from aqueous solutions.

نویسندگان

Sodabeh Heidarnejad

Health, Safety and Environment Technologies Research Core, Health Technology Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran

Ali Jafari

Health, Safety and Environment Technologies Research Core, Health Technology Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran

Seyyed Alireza Mousavi

Health, Safety and Environment Technologies Research Core, Health Technology Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran

Mohammad Javad Shokoohizadeh

Health, Safety and Environment Technologies Research Core, Health Technology Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Gorchev HG, Ozolins G. WHO guidelines for drinking-water quality. WHO ...
  • Bennekou SH, Allende A, Bearth A, Casacuberta J, Castle L, ...
  • Obotey Ezugbe E, Rathilal S. Membrane technologies in wastewater treatment: ...
  • Tripathi P, Srivastava VC, Kumar A. Optimization of an azo ...
  • Hasan DU, Abdul Aziz AR, Daud WM. Application of response ...
  • Koocheki A, Taherian AR, Razavi SM, Bostan A. Response surface ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع