Suction-Enhanced Flexible Ureteroscopy (Flexible and Navigable Suction, Direct In-scope Suction, and Steerable Ureteroscopic Renal Evacuation) Compared with Conventional Non-Suction Techniques: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis" >Suction-Enhanced Flexible Ureteroscopy (Flexible and Navigable Suction, Direct In-scope Suction, and Steerable Ureteroscopic Renal Evacuation) Compared with Conventional Non-Suction Techniques: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis" >Suction-Enhanced Flexible Ureteroscopy (Flexible and Navigable Suction, Direct In-scope Suction, and Steerable Ureteroscopic Renal Evacuation) Compared with Conventional Non-Suction Techniques: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis" >

<span lang="EN-ID">Suction-Enhanced Flexible Ureteroscopy (Flexible and Navigable Suction, Direct In-scope Suction, and Steerable Ureteroscopic Renal Evacuation) Compared with Conventional Non-Suction Techniques: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

سال انتشار: 1405
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 34

فایل این مقاله در 13 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_TUMS-8-2_003

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 16 تیر 1405

چکیده مقاله:

Introduction: Stone fragmentation during retrograde intrarenal surgery can obscure visualization and raise intrarenal pressure, posing procedural challenges. While various suction-enhanced systems have been developed to mitigate these issues, robust comparative evidence on their performance remains limited. This review synthesizes available evidence on safety and efficacy to guide optimal clinical use. Methods: A PROSPERO-registered systematic review and meta-analysis (CRD۴۲۰۲۵۱۲۳۵۱۸۳) identified comparative adult studies reporting stone-free rate (SFR) and secondary outcomes, such as operative time, complications, and reintervention. Randomized and observational studies were eligible. Data extraction and risk-of-bias assessment were performed independently, and random-effects model with Hartung-Knapp adjustments were applied. Results: Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Flexible and navigable suction (FANS) significantly improved SFR versus traditional ureteral access sheath (T-UAS) (pooled RR ۱.۱۴, ۹۵% CI ۱.۰۸-۱.۲۲) and immediate SFR (RR ۱.۴۶, ۹۵% CI ۱.۱۳-۱.۸۸). Compared with direct in-scope suction (DISS), SFR was comparable, though DISS required longer operative times. One three-arm study found combined DISS+FANS yielded the lowest residual fragments compared with either modality alone. For safety, FANS showed substantially fewer complications than T-UAS (RR ۰.۴۱, ۹۵% CI ۰.۲۷-۰.۶۲), consistent across minor (Clavien-Dindo I-II) and major (III-IV) events. DISS showed numerically higher complication rates than FANS, though without statistical significance. Reintervention outcomes varied across studies, with no consistent superiority of any technique. Conclusion: Suction technologies, particularly FANS, enhanced RIRS efficacy and maintain favorable safety. Emerging modalities such as DISS and SURE show promising outcome, although additional comparative trials are needed to establish their true efficacy and safety.

نویسندگان

Muhammad Hanif Arfiananda

Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia

Ponco Birowo

Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Sorokin I, Mamoulakis C, Miyazawa K, Rodgers A, Talati J, ...
  • Knoll T, Schubert AB, Fahlenkamp D, Leusmann DB, Wendt-Nordahl G, ...
  • Bartoletti R, Cai T, Mondaini N, Melone F, Travaglini F, ...
  • Yarimoglu S, Sahan M, Polat S, Koras O, Erdemoglu O, ...
  • Patel PU, Uy M, Dauw C, Sui W, Plott J, ...
  • Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, ...
  • Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan — ...
  • Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, et al. RoB ۲: ...
  • Sterne JAC, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, Al. E. ROBINS-I: a ...
  • R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical ...
  • Cacciatore L, Minore A, Bonanno L, Contessa P, Esperto F, ...
  • Luo D, Xu Z, Ding T, Liu Y, Li J. ...
  • Matlaga BR, Mueller TJ, Johnson B, Page J, Wolf JS, ...
  • Mazzon G, Dewan S, Rasheed M, Kulkarni S, Brusa D, ...
  • Ong CSH, Somani BK, Chew BH, Fong KY, Hamri S ...
  • Tai Y, Hsieh C, Tsai L, Chen M. Journal of ...
  • Uslu M, Yildirim Ü, Ezer M, Arslan ÖE, Ya H, ...
  • Yildirim Ü, Uslu M, Ezer M, Erdoğdu Ç, Kocaaslan R. ...
  • Ying Z, Dong H, Li C, Zhang S, Chen Y, ...
  • Zhu W, Liu S, Cao J, Wang H, Liang H, ...
  • Zhu Z, Cui Y, Zeng F, Li Y, Chen Z, ...
  • Gauhar V, Somani BK, Heng CT, Gauhar V, Chew BH, ...
  • Geavlete P, Mares C, Multescu R, Georgescu D, Ene C, ...
  • Hongbo X, Kefeng W, Yilun C, Qinggang W, Meng D, ...
  • Huang J, Du C, Zhai Q, Luo H, He X. ...
  • Hua Y, Liu S, Ma J, Gu H, Song R, ...
  • Lei C, Liao K, Yue J, Tang Z, Wang J, ...
  • Liu Q, Zeng T, Zhu S. Flexible suction ureteral access ...
  • Jung H, Osther PJ. Intraluminal pressure profiles during flexible ureterorenoscopy. ...
  • Corrales M, Sierra A, Doizi S, Traxer O. Risk of ...
  • Tokas T, Herrmann TRW, Skolarikos A, Nagele U. Training and ...
  • Hong A, du Plessis J, Browne C, Jack G, Bolton ...
  • Yuen SKK, Traxer O, Wroclawski ML, Gadzhiev N, Chai CA, ...
  • Giulioni C, Castellani D, Traxer O, Gadzhiev N, Pirola GM, ...
  • Quhal F, Zeng G, Seitz C. Current evidence for suction ...
  • Chen Y, Li C, Gao L, Lin L, Zheng L, ...
  • Nedbal C, Yuen SKK, Akram M, Keller EX, Martínez BB, ...
  • Madden A, Altez C, Lueza JP, Popescu RI, Cabrera J, ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع