Stress Distribution During Infra Zygomatic Crest-Supported Full-Arch Distalization with Intrusion Using Single and Dual TAD Configurations: A Finite Element Study

سال انتشار: 1405
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 69

فایل این مقاله در 12 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_ORTHO-21-1_008

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 16 تیر 1405

چکیده مقاله:

AimTo evaluate stress distribution and displacement patterns during infrazygomatic crest (IZC)–supported full‑arch distalization with intrusion and to compare the biomechanical performance of single versus dual anterior temporary anchorage device (TAD) configurations using finite element analysis.Methods A CBCT‑based three‑dimensional finite element model of the maxillary dentoalveolar complex was constructed, including teeth, periodontal ligament (PDL), cortical and cancellous bone, archwire, IZC screws, and TADs. Two anchorage configurations were simulated: a single anterior TAD placed between the maxillary central incisors and dual anterior TADs placed bilaterally between the central and lateral incisors, both combined with IZC screws. Distalization forces ranging from ۵۰ to ۷۰۰ g were applied with a constant intrusive force of ۵۰ g. Von Mises stress distribution and displacement patterns were evaluated in the cortical bone, PDL, dental roots, and anchorage components.ResultsFourteen loading conditions (۵۰–۷۰۰ g distalization combined with ۵۰ g intrusion) were analyzed. At low force levels (۵۰–۲۵۰ g), stresses remained within physiologic limits, with root stress ranging from ۱.۴۰ to ۱.۸۰ MPa and PDL stress from ۰.۰۱۵ to ۰.۰۲۰ MPa. With moderate forces (۳۰۰–۴۷۵ g), stresses increased, and root stress reached ۲.۸۸–۳.۰۳ MPa while PDL stress ranged from ۰.۰۲۶ to ۰.۰۳۰ MPa. At higher forces (۵۰۰–۷۰۰ g), stress levels further increased, with root stress ranging from ۴.۱۸ to ۴.۳۸ MPa and PDL stress from ۰.۰۴۱ to ۰.۰۴۴ MPa, indicating a potential overload region. Overall, stress and displacement values increased proportionally with increasing distalization force. The dual TAD configuration consistently demonstrated more favorable biomechanical behavior than the single‑TAD model, showing lower stress concentrations in cortical bone and the periodontal ligament, more uniform stress distribution, and reduced displacement of the maxillary teeth.ConclusionDual anterior TAD reinforcement during IZC-supported full-arch distalization with intrusion demonstrated a more uniform stress distribution and lower displacement values compared with the single TAD configuration, suggesting differences in biomechanical behavior between the two anchorage systems. Careful regulation of distalization force magnitude may help minimize localized stress within the dentoalveolar structures during skeletal anchorage–supported maxillary distalization.

نویسندگان

Sandeep Shetty

Professor, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Yenepoya Dental College, Yenepoya (Deemed to be University), Mangalore, Karnataka, India

Adil Ashraf

Resident, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Yenepoya Dental College, Yenepoya (Deemed to be University), Mangalore, Karnataka, India

Dilshad Umar

Associate Professor, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Yenepoya Dental College, Yenepoya (Deemed to be University), Mangalore, Karnataka, India

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Brezniak N, Wasserstein A. Root resorption after orthodontic treatment: Part ...
  • Brezniak N, Wasserstein A. Orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption. Part ...
  • Samandara A, Papageorgiou SN, Ioannidou-Marathiotou I, Kavvadia-Tsatala S, Papadopoulos MA. ...
  • Yassir YA, McIntyre GT, Bearn DR. Orthodontic treatment and root ...
  • Weltman B, Vig KW, Fields HW, Shanker S, Kaizar EE. ...
  • Bellini-Pereira SA, Almeida J, Aliaga-Del Castillo A, Dos Santos CCO, ...
  • Huang TTY, Elekdag-Turk S, Dalci O, Almuzian M, Karadeniz EI, ...
  • Antonarakis GS, Zekeridou A, Kiliaridis S, Giannopoulou C. Periodontal considerations ...
  • Roscoe MG, Meira JB, Cattaneo PM. Association of orthodontic force ...
  • Schwertner A, de Almeida-Pedrin RR, Poleti TMFF, Oltramari P, de ...
  • de Almeida MR. Clinical considerations for total arch distalization using ...
  • Alkadhimi A. Distalization with extra-alveolar temporary anchorage devices in the ...
  • Rosa WGN, de Almeida-Pedrin RR, Oltramari PVP, de Castro Conti ...
  • Shaikh A, Jamdar AF, Galgali SA, Patil S, Patel I, ...
  • Wu X, Liu H, Luo C, Li Y, Ding Y. ...
  • Papadopoulos MA, Tarawneh F. The use of miniscrew implants for ...
  • Liou EJ, Pai BC, Lin JC. Do miniscrews remain stationary ...
  • Motoyoshi M, Hirabayashi M, Uemura M, Shimizu N. Recommended placement ...
  • Moss ML, Skalak R, Patel H, Sen K, Moss-Salentijn L, ...
  • Khosravi S, Jahanshad H, Moafi M, Shahmohamadi M, Kachoei M. ...
  • Oğuz F, Özden S. Finite element analysis of maxillary arch ...
  • Fares M, Marzouk W, Ismail HA, Abuouf Y, Kassem HE. ...
  • Tanne K, Sakuda M, Burstone CJ. Three-dimensional finite element analysis ...
  • Melsen B. Tissue reaction to orthodontic tooth movementa new paradigm. ...
  • Cattaneo PM, Dalstra M, Melsen B. The finite element method: ...
  • Kravitz ND, Kusnoto B. Risks and complications of orthodontic miniscrews. ...
  • Wilmes B, Drescher D. Impact of insertion depth and predrilling ...
  • Lee JS, Kim DH, Park YC, Kyung SH, Kim TK. ...
  • Chan E, Darendeliler MA. Physical properties of root cementum: Part ...
  • Cattaneo PM, Dalstra M, Melsen B. Strains in periodontal ligament ...
  • Liou EJ, Chen PH, Wang YC, Lin JC. A computed ...
  • Paetyangkul A, Türk T, Elekdağ-Türk S, Jones AS, Petocz P, ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع