Applications of the Kirkpatrick Model in Post-secondary Health Sciences Education: A Scoping Review

سال انتشار: 1405
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 122

فایل این مقاله در 14 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_HPM-15-1_002

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 16 تیر 1405

چکیده مقاله:

Background  The Kirkpatrick model is commonly used as a systematic approach to evaluate training programs, although its application to health sciences experiential learning programs is not well-established. To inform the use of the Kirkpatrick model in the evaluation of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research’s (CIHR’s) Health System Impact Fellowship National Cohort Training Program (HSIF NCTP), we examined its application in post-secondary health sciences programs. Methods  Using the Joanna Briggs Institute’s updated methodology for scoping reviews, we searched CINAHL, EMBASE, ERIC, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science for studies published from ۲۰۱۷ to ۲۰۲۳ that focused on health sciences experiential learning programs held at universities and reported on at least one level of the Kirkpatrick model (ie, reaction, learning, behavior, results). We extracted data on study characteristics and reported outcomes for each of the Kirkpatrick model levels. Results  After deduplication, we screened ۷۵۵ titles and abstracts, we reviewed ۹۷ full texts, and we included ۳۴ studies in our scoping review. Many studies reported outcomes at the reaction or learning levels followed by the behaviour and results levels. Across levels, despite identifying several areas of improvement, learners typically reported favourable perceptions, increased confidence and knowledge, improved performance, and organizational improvements. Conclusion  The Kirkpatrick model is a widely used and highly adaptable evaluation model that has been successfully used to evaluate a range of post-secondary health sciences programs. Despite its wide use, evaluators using the Kirkpatrick model should use more robust methodologies to capture long-term behaviour and results associated with the programs. Future work should focus on evaluating a broader spectrum of programs such as doctoral- and postdoctoral-level experiential learning programs and underrepresented healthcare professions such as psychologists and dieticians. Integration of behaviour change and implementation science methodologies within the broader educational evaluation literature is also needed.

نویسندگان

Natasha L. Gallant

Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, University of Regina, Regina, SK, Canada

Elizabeth Oddone Paolucci

Departments of Community Health Sciences and Surgery, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada

Chelsea L. Russill

Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, University of Regina, Regina, SK, Canada

Ray Jewett

Ontario Health, Toronto, ON, Canada

Chantelle Recsky

School of Nursing, Faculty of Applied Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

Katherine Ford

Department of Kinesiology and Health Sciences, Faculty of Health, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada

Dina Idriss-Wheeler

Interdisciplinary School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada

Victrine Tseung

School of Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada

Hina Ansari

MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada

Zeenat Ladak

Department of Applied Psychology & Human Development, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Aida Fernandes

IMAGINE Network SPOR, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada

Deborah A. Marshall

Departments of Community Health Sciences and Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Kolb AY, Kolb DA. Experiential learning theory as a guide ...
  • Caley L, Williams SJ, Spernaes I, Thomas D, Behrens D, ...
  • Zhang X, Lin D, Pforsich H, Lin VW. Physician workforce ...
  • Kirkpatrick JD, Kirkpatrick WK. Kirkpatrick’s Four Levels of Training Evaluation. Alexandria, ...
  • Miller GE. The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Acad Med. ۱۹۹۰;۶۵(۹):۶۳-۶۷. doi:۱۰۹۷/۰۰۰۰۱۸۸۸-۱۹۹۰۰۹۰۰۰-۰۰۰۴۵Harden ...
  • Kirkpatrick D. Great ideas revisited: revisiting Kirkpatrick’s four-level model. Training ...
  • Kirkpatrick DL, Kirkpatrick JD. Transferring Learning to Behavior: Using the Four ...
  • Covidence systematic review software. Veritas Health Innovation, Melbourne, Australia. https://www.covidence.org/ ...
  • Kolb DA. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and ...
  • Blackmer AB, Thompson M, Brunner JM, Patel T, Saseen JJ. ...
  • Dante A, La Cerra C, Caponnetto V, et al. Dose–response ...
  • Stufflebeam DL, Zhang G. The CIPP Evaluation Model: How to Evaluate ...
  • Freeth D, Hammick M, Koppel I, Reeves S, Barr H. ...
  • Chermack TJ, Kasshanna BK. The use and misuse of SWOT ...
  • Kusmiati M. A comprehensive evaluation in medical curriculum using the ...
  • Allen LM, Hay M, Palermo C. Evaluation in health professions ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع