An Investigation of Johnson and Lakoff Point of View in the Paradox of Mind Concept and to Compare with the Concept of Ego from the Viewpoint of Islamic Philosophers and Western Philosophe
محل انتشار: هشتمین همایش بین المللی علوم شناختی
سال انتشار: 1399
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 46
متن کامل این مقاله منتشر نشده است و فقط به صورت چکیده یا چکیده مبسوط در پایگاه موجود می باشد.
توضیح: معمولا کلیه مقالاتی که کمتر از ۵ صفحه باشند در پایگاه سیویلیکا اصل مقاله (فول تکست) محسوب نمی شوند و فقط کاربران عضو بدون کسر اعتبار می توانند فایل آنها را دریافت نمایند.
- صدور گواهی نمایه سازی
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
ICCS08_077
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 8 تیر 1405
چکیده مقاله:
Lakoff and Johnson are stand on the fact that the mind is essentially physical. Thought is mostly unknowing. The abstract concepts are mostly metaphorical. These three cases transform the whole tradition of Western philosophy. Lakoff and Johnson argue that Western philosophers can no longer continue to operate as it has been, since these three theories are basically based on the tradition of philosophy West are in conflict. They say most in the philosophical tradition of the West that the wisdom is an unintelligible one that is in no way dependent on the human body and brain. Also, the wisdom is completely conscious, and the concepts used in philosophy are not in any way metaphorical and imaginative, but are completely abstract and emotional and emotional. But on the basis of cognitive science, the claim is that the human wisdom structure is rooted in its brain structure, and the neuronal system of the human brain forms the forms of understanding and wisdom of man. Also, the human body and its physical experience play a central role in this field. As the brain and neuronal structure provides it for human-sensory capability, it also gives it the ability to create conceptual systems and methods of understanding and reasoning. The other is that wisdom is mostly unknowing and not conscious. In addition, this human reason is mostly metaphorical and imaginative. Islamic philosophers such as Ibn Sina Mulla Sadra... Like many Western philosophers do not believe in the physiognomy of mind. Ibn Sina in the argument of the hanging man shows that the soul is independent of body and non-material. In his works, he has said in many cases: Methods: library Results: Fundamental examination of the mind Conclusion: "The soul is not the body. The soul of human dignity is not in the material. There is also no sign of the body and the right of the body. The idea of Plato in the interface between knowing the dark core between the soul and the body expresses the principle of the need for a relationship between the soul and body of this philosopher, which in this respect is similar to the beliefs of Ebn-Sina and Suhrawardi". Plato, in spite of the belief in the inherent distinction between self and body, does not deny the influence of the two. In general, Islamic philosophers prove the subtlety of the soul of the dætegh and the body, and they are related only in their tendencies.
کلیدواژه ها:
نویسندگان
Mahmud reza Qasemi
Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Theology, Farabi Campus, University of Tehran, PhD student
Seyed Mohammad Ali Dibaji
Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Theology, Farabi Campus, University of Tehran, Associate Professor
Alireza Ghaeminia
Institute for Islamic Culture and Thought, Associate Professor
Mahmoud Reza Qasemi
Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Theology, Farabi Campus, University of Tehran, PhD student