Sustainability index and matrix multiplication of broiler farming partnerships for environmental performance improvement

سال انتشار: 1405
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 3

فایل این مقاله در 22 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_GJESM-12-3_018

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 1 تیر 1405

چکیده مقاله:

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Broiler farming partnerships are increasingly adopted to enhance production efficiency and farmer livelihoods; however, their environmental sustainability remains inadequately addressed. Prior studies have mainly highlighted performance, while the integration of environmental, technological, social, and institutional factors has been somewhat lacking. The objectives of the study were to evaluate the sustainability status of partnership-based broiler farming systems and to identify the structural causal relationships among dominant leverage variables using an integrated Rapid appraisal for fisheries – multidimensional scaling and matrix of cross-impact multiplications applied to classification framework.METHODS: A multidimensional sustainability assessment was conducted using a structured framework comprising ecological, economic, social, technological, and partnership dimensions. A comprehensive total of ۳۲ sustainability attributes were recognized and integrated into a survey tool. Data were obtained from ۱۷ expert respondents selected through purposive sampling based on their experience and involvement in broiler partnership systems. Sustainability indices and leverage factors were created utilizing multidimensional scaling, subsequently employing cross-impact matrix multiplication applied in classification structural analysis to categorize dominant variables according to their their driving power and dependence.FINDINGS: The findings reveal a moderate sustainability status, with environmental performance achieving the highest index (۷۰.۵۷) percent, followed by technological (۶۲.۶۲) percent, economic (۵۶.۵۲) percent, and social (۵۲.۶۵). In contrast, the partnership dimension exhibited a lower sustainability level (۴۷.۰۰) percent. Matrix of cross impact multiplications applied to classification analysis revealed that mortality causes, chicken mortality rate, sanitation practices, feeding equipment, housing type, and manure waste utilization function as critical linkage variables, indicating strong cross-dimensional interdependencies. The study demonstrates robust interrelations among different dimensions, showing that advancements in technological efficiency and management practices foster economic improvements and lower environmental repercussions. However, weak partnership arrangements and governance limitations significantly hinder overall system performance. CONCLUSION: The study highlights that the integration of both methods demonstrates that sustainability in broiler partnerships emerges from dynamic interactions among biosecurity, housing technology, labor capability, waste valorization, and institutional trust. This systems-based framework provides a stronger basis for designing phased sustainability interventions and adaptive governance strategies in emerging poultry industries. Recent agrifood systems studies similarly emphasize causal structural mapping as an effective instrument for planning sustainability transitions.

کلیدواژه ها:

Broiler partnership system ، Multidimensional scaling (MDS) ، Matrix of cross impact multiplications applied to classification (MICMAC) ، Partnership governance ، Sustainability assessment.

نویسندگان

Cepriadi

Department of Agribusiness, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Riau, Pekanbaru, Indonesia

Novian

Department of Agribusiness, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Riau, Pekanbaru, Indonesia

M. Herlon

Department of Agribusiness, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Riau, Pekanbaru, Indonesia

H. Daulay

Research for Behavioral and Circular Economy, National Research and Innovation Agency, Indonesia

A. Dwi Santoso

Research Center for Industrial Systems and Sustainable Manufacturing, National Research and Innovation Agency, Indonesia

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Ahmad, I.; Mashwani, Z.; Raja, N.I.; Kazmi, A.; Wahab, A.; ...
  • Akporube, K.; Ikpendu, C.; Edward, I., (۲۰۲۳). Poultry waste management ...
  • Akter, M.S.; Uddin, M.T.; Dhar, A.R., (۲۰۲۳). Advancing safe broiler ...
  • Allaily; Santoso, A.D.; Rofiq, M.N.; Sasongko, N.A.; Daulay, H.; Wiloso, ...
  • Arora-Jonsson, S.; McAreavey, R.; Waldenström, C.; Stiernström, A.; Sandström, E.; ...
  • Attia, Y.A.; Aldhalmi, A.K.; Youssef, I.M.; Fulvia Bovera, F.; Tufarelli, ...
  • Balasundram, S.K.; Shamshiri, R.R.; Sridhara, S., (۲۰۲۳). The role of ...
  • Bartzas, G.; Komnitsas, K., (۲۰۲۰). Integrated multi-criteria analysis for assessing ...
  • Barrios, E.; Gemmill-Herren, B.; Bicksler, A.; Siliprandi, E.; Brathwaite, R.; ...
  • Beal, C.M.; Robinson, D.M.; Smith, J.; Gerber Van Doren, L.; ...
  • Bennett, C.; Thomas, R.; Williams, M.; Zalasiewicz, J.; Edgeworth, M.; ...
  • Birhanu, M.; Osei-Amponsah, R.; Obese, F.; Dessie, T., (۲۰۲۳). Smallholder ...
  • Braga, L.; Renato, N.; Lima, N.; Ruviaro, C.; Bamber, N., ...
  • Bristi Devnath; Rana, A.H.; Mohiuddin, A.; Ghosh, P.; Sobur, K.; ...
  • Conway, T., (۲۰۲۵). The role of intermediaries in transitions to ...
  • FAO, (۲۰۲۴). Food outlook: biannual report on global food markets. ...
  • FAO, (۲۰۲۰). FAOSTAT statistical database: livestock primary production. FAO ...
  • Gilbert, M.; Xiao, X.; Robinson, T.P., (۲۰۱۷). Intensifying poultry production ...
  • Handayani, T.; Santoso, A.D.; Sastranegara, M.H.; Lestari, S.; Djarot, I.N.; ...
  • Haq, M.; Arman, S.; Nazera, F., (۲۰۲۱). Contract farming in ...
  • Henchion, M.; Hayes, M.; Mullen, A.M.; Fenelon, M.; Tiwari, B., ...
  • Herrero, M.; Grace, D.; Njuki, J.; Johnson, N.; Enahoro, D.; ...
  • Junaidi, E.J., (۲۰۲۳). Comparative analysis of contract farming effect on ...
  • Karaman, S.; Taşcıoğlu, Y.; Bulut, O.D., (۲۰۲۳). Profitability and cost ...
  • Kavanagh, P.K.; Pitcher, T.J., (۲۰۰۴). Implementing Microsoft Excel software for ...
  • Kiprop, E.; Chelagat, J.; Xianhui, G.; Mwalupaso, E.G.; Bezu, K.; ...
  • Leinonen, I.; Williams, A.G.; Wiseman, J.; Guy, J.; Kyriazakis, I., ...
  • Liang, Y.; Tabler, G.T.; Dridi, S., (۲۰۲۰). Sprinkler technology improves ...
  • Munarso, S.J.; Purwanta, W.; Elmatsani, H.M.; Hendriadi, A.; Arianto, A.; ...
  • Ngwenya, P.; Anwana, E.; Mugano, G., (۲۰۲۵). Agricultural value chain ...
  • OECD-FAO, (۲۰۲۴). OECD-FAO agricultural outlook ۲۰۲۴–۲۰۳۳. OECD Publishing (۱۵۰ pages) ...
  • Patel, R.K.; Chander, M.; Verma, M.R.; Johnson, D.C., (۲۰۲۲). Adoption ...
  • Pitcher, T.J.; Lam, M.E.; Ainsworth, C.; Martindale, A.; Nakamura, K.; ...
  • Pitcher, T.J.; Preikshot, D., (۲۰۰۱). RAPFISH: A rapid appraisal technique ...
  • Putri, A.; Rondhi, M., (۲۰۲۰). Contract farming and the effect ...
  • Queenan, K.; Cuevas, S.; Mabhaudhi, T.; Chimonyo, M.; Slotow, R.; ...
  • Rachman, B.; Ariningsih, E.; Sudaryanto, T.; Ariani, M.; Septanti, K.S.; Adawiyah, C,R.; Ashari; Agustian, A.; ...
  • Ragasa, C.; Lambrecht, I.; Kufoalor, D.S., (۲۰۱۸). Limitations of contract ...
  • Rondhi, M.; Aji, J.; Khasan, A.; Yanuarti, R., (۲۰۲۰). Factors ...
  • Rohaeni, E.S.; Ilham, N.; Saptati, R.A.; Sulistyawati, H.; Rahayu, P., ...
  • Rusdiana, S.; Kostaman, T.; Priyono, P.; Kusumaningrum, D.; Praharani, L.; ...
  • Sakata, A.; Siqueira, J., (۲۰۲۴). Lighting in broiler poultry houses: ...
  • Santoso, A.D.; Daulay, H.; Priyanti, A.; Silalahi, V.M.M.; Yaumidin, U.K.; ...
  • Schwarz, G.; Vanni, F.; Miller, D.; Helin, J.; Pražan, J.; ...
  • Setiadi, A.; Santoso, S.I.; Mukson, M.; Roessali, W., (۲۰۲۲). Contract ...
  • Sharma, R.; Kannan, D.; Darbari, J.D., (۲۰۲۲). Analysis of Collaborative ...
  • Sumiati, S.; Fadilah, R.; Darmawan, A.; Nadia, R., (۲۰۲۵). Challenges ...
  • Ton, G.; Vellema, W.; Desiere, S.; Weituschat, S.; D’Haese, M., ...
  • Vaarst, M.; Steenfeldt, S.; Horsted, K., (۲۰۱۵). Sustainable development perspectives ...
  • Vikas; Ranjan, R., (۲۰۲۴). Agroecological approaches to sustainable development. Front. ...
  • Wang, H.H.; Wang, Y.; Delgado, M.S., (۲۰۱۴). The transition to ...
  • Widjaja, E.; Utomo, B.N.; Santoso, A.D.; Erlambang, Y.P.; Surono; Firmansyah, ...
  • Wong, J.T.; De Bruyn, J.; Bagnol, B.; Grieve, H.; Li, ...
  • Zhang, L.; Ren, J.; Bai, W., (۲۰۲۳). Poultry waste-to-wealth: technological ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع