The Mediating Role of Self-Efficacy and Social Support in the Effect of Psychological Hardiness on the Quality of Life of Physically Disabled People

سال انتشار: 1405
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 69

فایل این مقاله در 12 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_PRIEN-4-2_001

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 1 تیر 1405

چکیده مقاله:

The present study aimed to investigate the structural relationship between psychological hardiness and quality of life in physically and motor disabled individuals, with the mediating roles of self-efficacy and perceived social support. This applied, cross-sectional, correlational study was conducted using structural equation modeling among physically and motor disabled individuals in Mazandaran Province, Iran. The statistical population consisted of approximately ۲۶,۰۰۰ individuals registered in the provincial Welfare Organization, from whom ۴۲۴ participants aged ۱۴–۴۰ years (۲۷۷ males and ۱۴۷ females) were selected through two-stage cluster sampling from Sari, Amol, Behshahr, and Chalus cities. Data were collected using the Ahvaz Psychological Hardiness Questionnaire, the SF-۳۶ Quality of Life Questionnaire, Sherer’s Self-Efficacy Scale, and the Sherbourne and Stewart Social Support Scale. The instruments demonstrated acceptable reliability coefficients ranging from ۰.۸۶ to ۰.۹۱. Descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation coefficients, Sobel tests, and structural equation modeling were performed using SPSS-۲۲, AMOS, and SmartPLS software at a ۹۵% confidence level. The results demonstrated significant positive relationships among all study variables. Psychological hardiness had significant direct effects on self-efficacy (β=۰.۱۰, T=۲.۰۹, P<۰.۰۱), perceived social support (β=۰.۲۷, T=۲.۵۳, P<۰.۰۱), and quality of life (β=۰.۱۰, T=۲.۹۴, P<۰.۰۱). Self-efficacy also showed a significant direct effect on quality of life (β=۰.۱۱, T=۲.۵۵, P<۰.۰۱), while perceived social support significantly predicted quality of life (β=۰.۱۸, T=۲.۷۱, P<۰.۰۱). Pearson correlation analysis revealed the strongest correlation between psychological hardiness and quality of life (r=۰.۸۵۳, P<۰.۰۱). Sobel test findings confirmed the mediating role of self-efficacy (β=۰.۰۴, Z=۲.۵۷, P=۰.۰۱) and perceived social support (β=۰.۰۳, Z=۲.۷۴, P=۰.۰۰۱) in the relationship between psychological hardiness and quality of life. The proposed model explained ۱۸% of the variance in self-efficacy, ۱۴% in social support, and ۱۱% in quality of life. The findings indicate that psychological hardiness contributes significantly to improving the quality of life of physically disabled individuals both directly and indirectly through enhancing self-efficacy and perceived social support. Strengthening resilience-related psychological characteristics, promoting self-efficacy beliefs, and expanding supportive social networks may improve mental health and overall life satisfaction among individuals with physical and motor disabilities. Therefore, psychological interventions and rehabilitation programs focused on resilience enhancement and social support development are recommended for improving the well-being and quality of life of this population. The present study aimed to investigate the structural relationship between psychological hardiness and quality of life in physically and motor disabled individuals, with the mediating roles of self-efficacy and perceived social support. This applied, cross-sectional, correlational study was conducted using structural equation modeling among physically and motor disabled individuals in Mazandaran Province, Iran. The statistical population consisted of approximately ۲۶,۰۰۰ individuals registered in the provincial Welfare Organization, from whom ۴۲۴ participants aged ۱۴–۴۰ years (۲۷۷ males and ۱۴۷ females) were selected through two-stage cluster sampling from Sari, Amol, Behshahr, and Chalus cities. Data were collected using the Ahvaz Psychological Hardiness Questionnaire, the SF-۳۶ Quality of Life Questionnaire, Sherer’s Self-Efficacy Scale, and the Sherbourne and Stewart Social Support Scale. The instruments demonstrated acceptable reliability coefficients ranging from ۰.۸۶ to ۰.۹۱. Descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation coefficients, Sobel tests, and structural equation modeling were performed using SPSS-۲۲, AMOS, and SmartPLS software at a ۹۵% confidence level. The results demonstrated significant positive relationships among all study variables. Psychological hardiness had significant direct effects on self-efficacy (β=۰.۱۰, T=۲.۰۹, P<۰.۰۱), perceived social support (β=۰.۲۷, T=۲.۵۳, P<۰.۰۱), and quality of life (β=۰.۱۰, T=۲.۹۴, P<۰.۰۱). Self-efficacy also showed a significant direct effect on quality of life (β=۰.۱۱, T=۲.۵۵, P<۰.۰۱), while perceived social support significantly predicted quality of life (β=۰.۱۸, T=۲.۷۱, P<۰.۰۱). Pearson correlation analysis revealed the strongest correlation between psychological hardiness and quality of life (r=۰.۸۵۳, P<۰.۰۱). Sobel test findings confirmed the mediating role of self-efficacy (β=۰.۰۴, Z=۲.۵۷, P=۰.۰۱) and perceived social support (β=۰.۰۳, Z=۲.۷۴, P=۰.۰۰۱) in the relationship between psychological hardiness and quality of life. The proposed model explained ۱۸% of the variance in self-efficacy, ۱۴% in social support, and ۱۱% in quality of life. The findings indicate that psychological hardiness contributes significantly to improving the quality of life of physically disabled individuals both directly and indirectly through enhancing self-efficacy and perceived social support. Strengthening resilience-related psychological characteristics, promoting self-efficacy beliefs, and expanding supportive social networks may improve mental health and overall life satisfaction among individuals with physical and motor disabilities. Therefore, psychological interventions and rehabilitation programs focused on resilience enhancement and social support development are recommended for improving the well-being and quality of life of this population.

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Albakova, Z. A. M., Ezhov, K. S., Umerkaeva, S. S., ...
  • Awick, E. A., Ehlers, D. K., Aguinaga, S., Daugherty, A. ...
  • Azadi, R., Ahadi, H., & Hatami, H. R. (2020). The ...
  • Bahrami, M., Mohamadirizi, S., & Mohamadirizi, S. (2018). Hardiness and ...
  • Bellin, M. H., Osteen, P., Kub, J., Bollinger, M. E., ...
  • Boyraz, G., & Sayger, T. V. (2011). Psychological well-being among ...
  • Cattik, M., & Aksoy, V. (2018). An examination of the ...
  • Davarmnesh, A., & Barati Sade, F. (2007). Introduction to Rehabilitation ...
  • Dermani, H. R. K., Haghighatian, M., & Khalili, E. R. ...
  • Dube, M. O., Roos, M., Desmeules, F., & Roy, J. ...
  • Farahbakhsh Beh, S., Mehrinejad, A., & Moazedian, A. (2019). Structural ...
  • Farahmand, M., Jiriai, R., & Salehzadeh, M. (2019). The role ...
  • Gelkop, N., & Engel-Yeger, B. (2025). Participation, environment, and quality ...
  • Ghafari, G., Karimi, A., & Nozari, H. (2013). Trend study ...
  • Gholami Jam, F., Takaffoli, M., Kamali, M., Eslamian, A., Alavi, ...
  • Haugland, T. (2013). Stress, social support, general self-efficacy and health ...
  • Honey, A., Emerson, E., Llewellyn, G., & Kariuki, M. (2010). ...
  • Hosseini, Z., Pourjalil, F., & Homayuni, A. (2024). Investigating the ...
  • Iravani, M., Riahi, L., Abdi, K., & Tabibi, S. J. ...
  • Kiamarci, A. (1998). Creating and validating a scale for assessing ...
  • Kim, Y. J., Lee, H. M., & Lee, S. Y. ...
  • Kuprieieva, O., Traverse, T., Serdiuk, L., Chykhantsova, O., & Shamych, ...
  • Li, J., Lin, Y., Li, X., Cui, Y., Wang, Q., ...
  • Martinez-Marti, M. L., & Ruch, W. (2017). Character strengths predict ...
  • Mehrabi, A. (2017). Statistical Yearbook. ...
  • Miller, M. J., Cook, P. F., Magnusson, D. M., Morris, ...
  • Mirghazanfari, B., & Khosh Akhlagh, H. (2021). The mediating role ...
  • Moshavvegh, S., Goodarzi, N., Emamipour, S., & Sepah Mansour, M. ...
  • Pourakbari, F., Khajevand Khoshli, A., & Asadi, J. (2014). Relationship ...
  • Russo, R. N., Goodwin, E. J., Miller, M. D., Haan, ...
  • Sabzmanesh Jafari, S., Amraei, K., & Hasanzadeh, N. (2021). The ...
  • Sadeghi, A., & Einaky, S. (2020). Relationship between Psychological Hardiness ...
  • Sattari, B., Omidvar, K., & Yaghoubi, V. (2005). Measurement of ...
  • Schel, S. H. H., Bouman, Y. H. A., & Bulten, ...
  • Sharifi Fardshad, M., Bahrami Hidaji, M., Sodagar, S., Hassani Abharian, ...
  • Shirazi, M., Chari, M., Jafari Kahkha, S., & Marashi, F. ...
  • Shokrpoor, S., Khalatbari, J., & Ghorbanshiroudi, S. (2022). Predicting quality ...
  • Strubbe, S., Roy, S., Sidorenko, I., & Lampe, R. (2025). ...
  • Van Timmeren, E. A., Van der Schans, C. P., Van ...
  • Yilmaz, T., & Bozo, O. (2019). Psychometric qualities of Medical ...
  • Zeer, E. F., Yugova, E. A., Karpova, N. P., & ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع