Efficacy of Intratympanic versus Systemic Corticosteroids in Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review
سال انتشار: 1405
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 123
فایل این مقاله در 12 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد
- صدور گواهی نمایه سازی
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
JR_IJOTO-38-3_001
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 1 تیر 1405
چکیده مقاله:
Introduction:Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) is an otologic emergency that typically requires prompt treatment with corticosteroids, administered either systemically or intratympanically. The optimal route for initial therapy remains uncertain due to heterogeneity in efficacy and safety profiles.Materials and Methods:We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between ۲۰۱۱ and ۲۰۲۵, comparing intratympanic and systemic corticosteroids as primary treatment for SSNHL in adults. Following PRISMA ۲۰۲۰ and Cochrane Handbook guidelines, we screened studies without language restrictions. Two independent reviewers performed study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment using the RoB ۲.۰ tool. Outcomes were synthesized narratively, focusing on changes in pure-tone average (PTA), complete/functional recovery, speech discrimination, and safety. Trials with combination/salvage strategies, adjuncts, or formulation comparisons were synthesized separately.Results:Seventeen RCTs were included. Efficacy results were heterogeneous; however, most studies indicated that intratympanic corticosteroids are at least as effective as systemic therapy. In severe hearing loss, intratympanic treatment achieved higher success rates (up to ۷۰.۶%) and greater PTA improvement compared to systemic administration. Adverse events differed by route: systemic corticosteroids were associated with metabolic disturbances, while intratympanic therapy caused localized, self-limiting events. Overall, ۴۷.۱% of studies had high risk of bias, and ۵۲.۹% showed some concerns.Conclusion:Intratympanic corticosteroids appear to be a non-inferior alternative to systemic steroids for initial SSNHL treatment, with potential advantages in cases of severe hearing loss or systemic contraindications. Nonetheless, methodological limitations across studies warrant cautious interpretation. Future high-quality trials should address efficacy, functional recovery, and safety more rigorously.
کلیدواژه ها:
نویسندگان
Mateo Leal Capacho
Department of Medicine, University of Pamplona, Cúcuta, Colombia.
Laura León Suárez
Department of Medicine, University of Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia.
Merly Figueroa Márquez
Department of Medicine, University of Cartagena, Bogotá, Colombia.
Jessica Cuaspa Damian
Department of Medicine, University of Militar Nueva Granada, Sabaneta, Antioquia, Colombia.
Juan Alzate Granados
Department of Public Health, Nacional University of Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.
Francisco Gómez Ballesta
Department of Medicine, University of Autónoma de Bucaramanga, Bucaramanga, Colombia.
مراجع و منابع این مقاله:
لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :