Criticism and analysis of regulations related to the requirement of official registration of real estate transactions

in this research, while criticizing and analyzing the provisions related to the law requiring official registration of real estate transactions, we examine the challenges and ambiguities in the implementation of this law. Using the descriptive-analytical research method and relying on the legislative records and legal and judicial procedures of the past, we study and interpret the various articles of the said law. The results of the analysis show that the new law has expanded the scope of legal acts subject to registration and considers various transactions such as contracts (sale, peace, exchange, gift, pre-sale of building) and events (will of possession, lease, settlement of interests, lease subject to possession, mortgage, endowment, right of usufruct, right of easement and obligation to perform legal acts) that are valid for more than two years, must be subject to registration. Also, the bequest of benefits for a period of more than two years and the commitment to perform the aforementioned legal acts in relation to immovable property are also included in this category However, in cases such as possessive will, intercession and preparation of corrective report by the courts, the exact and unambiguous implementation of the law faces doubts and challenges. In addition, compared to the registration law and previous versions, changes have been made in the approach of the new law regarding the requirements of registration of legal acts, which require a more detailed analysis. Finally, this research provides solutions to resolve ambiguities and facilitate the implementation of the law, as well as to prevent judicial disputes.