Background: Orthopedic problems associated with trauma frequently require exact surgical procedures to guarantee adequate stabilization and recovery. Robotic technology in orthopedic trauma surgery has emerged as a promising method to improve surgical precision and results. This systematic study seeks to assess the efficacy, safety, and usability of robotic systems in stabilizing orthopedic injuries during trauma procedures. Materials and Methods: We performed a comprehensive search of databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, for papers published between January ۲۰۱۰ and December ۲۰۲۴. Terms including "robotic surgery," "orthopedic trauma," "fracture stabilization," and "robotic-assisted surgery" were utilized. The inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, and case-control studies that examined robotic-assisted methods for orthopedic trauma stabilization. Studies were omitted if they pertained to non-traumatic orthopedic problems or did not incorporate a robotic surgical element. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for randomized controlled trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational research were employed to evaluate the risk of bias. Data synthesis employed meta-analytic methods when feasible, and narrative summaries were offered for diverse data. Results: Of the ۱,۴۳۲ studies evaluated, ۲۵ satisfied the inclusion criteria, involving a total of ۵,۶۷۸ patients. Most trials indicated enhanced fracture alignment and decreased surgery duration with robotic aid relative to traditional techniques. The primary outcomes encompassed surgical precision, duration of the procedure, and incidence of complications. A meta-analysis of ۱۰ randomized controlled trials (۲,۳۴۵ patients) demonstrated a substantial decrease in malalignment rates (Risk Ratio [RR] ۰.۶۸; ۹۵% Confidence Interval [CI] ۰.۵۲-۰.۸۵). Additionally, robotic-assisted surgeries resulted in reduced hospital stays (mean difference -۲.۱ days, ۹۵% CI -۳.۰ to -۱.۲). Nonetheless, the initial expenses and the learning curve related to robotic systems were recognized as obstacles to wider implementation. Conclusion: Robotic technology in orthopedic trauma procedures has considerable potential to augment surgical precision, diminish complications, and improve patient outcomes. The findings highlight its benefits; yet, economic factors and training demands persist as difficulties. Subsequent study ought to concentrate on cost-effectiveness evaluations and long-term outcomes to enable incorporation into standard surgical practice. These developments have the potential to transform trauma care, guaranteeing safer and more effective interventions for orthopedic injuries.
