Presenting a Model of Ambidextrous Human Resource Management in Project-Oriented Organizations

سال انتشار: 1405
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 15

فایل این مقاله در 14 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JIMOB-6-2_002

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 13 خرداد 1405

چکیده مقاله:

Objective: The objective of this study was to develop and empirically validate a comprehensive model of ambidextrous human resource management (A-HRM) tailored to the structural and behavioral requirements of project-oriented organizations.Methods and Materials: This study employed a mixed-methods sequential exploratory design consisting of qualitative and quantitative phases. In the qualitative phase, semi-structured interviews were conducted with ۲۰ experts in ambidextrous HRM using purposive and snowball sampling until theoretical saturation was achieved. The interviews were analyzed through open, axial, and selective coding using MAXQDA, and thematic structures underlying motivational, empowering, and opportunity-creating HRM practices were extracted. In the quantitative phase, a researcher-developed questionnaire was administered to ۲۱۳ employees of a large project-oriented organization. Measurement reliability was assessed through Cronbach’s alpha, composite reliability (CR), and average variance extracted (AVE), while normality was examined using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was applied to examine path coefficients, t-values, predictive relevance (Q²), coefficient of determination (R²), and overall model fit (GOF).Findings: The Kolmogorov–Smirnov results indicated all variables were non-normal (p < ۰.۰۵), supporting the use of SEM with non-parametric assumptions. All main constructs—motivational practices (R² = ۰.۸۳۶), empowering practices (R² = ۰.۸۱۳), and opportunity-creating practices (R² = ۰.۷۳۳)—showed strong explanatory power. Path coefficients exceeded significance thresholds (t > ۱.۹۶), confirming meaningful relationships among variables. Predictive relevance values indicated strong model validity (Q² > ۰.۳۵). The overall model demonstrated excellent global fit (GOF = ۰.۵۶), confirming strong structural integrity and predictive capability.Conclusion: The validated model demonstrates that ambidextrous HRM—comprising motivational, empowering, and opportunity-creating practices—provides a robust conceptual and operational foundation for enhancing exploration–exploitation balance in project-oriented organizations, thereby supporting adaptability, innovation, and sustained organizational performance. Objective: The objective of this study was to develop and empirically validate a comprehensive model of ambidextrous human resource management (A-HRM) tailored to the structural and behavioral requirements of project-oriented organizations. Methods and Materials: This study employed a mixed-methods sequential exploratory design consisting of qualitative and quantitative phases. In the qualitative phase, semi-structured interviews were conducted with ۲۰ experts in ambidextrous HRM using purposive and snowball sampling until theoretical saturation was achieved. The interviews were analyzed through open, axial, and selective coding using MAXQDA, and thematic structures underlying motivational, empowering, and opportunity-creating HRM practices were extracted. In the quantitative phase, a researcher-developed questionnaire was administered to ۲۱۳ employees of a large project-oriented organization. Measurement reliability was assessed through Cronbach’s alpha, composite reliability (CR), and average variance extracted (AVE), while normality was examined using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was applied to examine path coefficients, t-values, predictive relevance (Q²), coefficient of determination (R²), and overall model fit (GOF). Findings: The Kolmogorov–Smirnov results indicated all variables were non-normal (p < ۰.۰۵), supporting the use of SEM with non-parametric assumptions. All main constructs—motivational practices (R² = ۰.۸۳۶), empowering practices (R² = ۰.۸۱۳), and opportunity-creating practices (R² = ۰.۷۳۳)—showed strong explanatory power. Path coefficients exceeded significance thresholds (t > ۱.۹۶), confirming meaningful relationships among variables. Predictive relevance values indicated strong model validity (Q² > ۰.۳۵). The overall model demonstrated excellent global fit (GOF = ۰.۵۶), confirming strong structural integrity and predictive capability. Conclusion: The validated model demonstrates that ambidextrous HRM—comprising motivational, empowering, and opportunity-creating practices—provides a robust conceptual and operational foundation for enhancing exploration–exploitation balance in project-oriented organizations, thereby supporting adaptability, innovation, and sustained organizational performance.

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Alidadi Talkhestani, Y., Mahmoodzadeh, E., Mousakhani, M., & Alvani, S. ...
  • Ardabili, F. S., Verbenko, G., & Cajnko, P. (2025). The ...
  • Asili, G. (2014). Strategic analysis of structural pattern and placement ...
  • Asili, G., Afkhami Ardakani, M., Ebrahimi, M., & Vermziar, M. ...
  • Diaz-Fernandez, M., Pasamar-Reyes, S., & Valle-Cabrera, R. (2017). Human capital ...
  • Eriksson, P. E. (2013). Exploration and exploitation in project-based organizations: ...
  • Faten Ahmed Mohammed Abd El, s., & Ahmed, M. (2024). ...
  • Garaus, C., Güttel, W. H., Konlechner, S., Koprax, I., Lackner, ...
  • Haghighi, M., Dehghani Soltani, M., & Farsizadeh, H. (2018). Explaining ...
  • Haider, S. A., Zubair, M., Tehseen, S., Iqbal, S., & ...
  • Hossain, M. I., Kumar, J., Islam, M. T., & Valeri, ...
  • Huang, J., & Kim, H. J. (2013). Conceptualizing structural ambidexterity ...
  • Membini, Y. (2014). Presenting a conceptual framework of the role ...
  • Moreno-Luzon, M., Gil-Marques, M., Lloria, M. B., & Salas-Vallina, A. ...
  • Nasution, H., Muafi, M., El-Qadri, Z. M., & Suprihanto, J. ...
  • Park, Y., Pavlou, P. A., & Saraf, N. (2020). Configurations ...
  • Patel, P. C., Messersmith, J. G., & Lepak, D. P. ...
  • Peng, H. (2019). Organizational ambidexterity in public non-profit organizations: interest ...
  • Pertusa-Ortega, E. M., Molina-Azorín, J. F., Tarí, J. J., Pereira-Moliner, ...
  • Posch, A., & Garaus, C. (2020). Boon or curse? A ...
  • Sanai, S., Pour Kiani, M., Selajgeh, S., & Sayyadi, S. ...
  • Sengura, J. D., Mu, R., & Zhang, J. (2024). Towards ...
  • Shafique, I., Kalyar, M. N., & Mehwish, N. (2021). Organizational ...
  • Sohani, S. S., & Singh, M. (2017). Multilevel analysis of ...
  • Tahmasbi, R., Mirzamani, A., & Brumand, M. (2019). Designing Human ...
  • Turner, N., Maylor, H., & Swart, J. (2015). Ambidexterity in ...
  • Turner, N., Swart, J., & Maylor, H. (2013). Mechanisms for ...
  • Wang, C.-H., & Hsu, L.-C. (2014). Building exploration and exploitation ...
  • Waseel, A. H., Zhang, J., Shehzad, M. U., Hussain Sarki, ...
  • Zebari, M. R. Y. (2024). The Effect of Organizational Flexibility ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع