Identifying the Challenges of COVID-۱۹ Crisis Management in the Education System (Case Study: Khoy County)
سال انتشار: 1405
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 20
فایل این مقاله در 16 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد
- صدور گواهی نمایه سازی
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
JR_JIMOB-6-2_003
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 13 خرداد 1405
چکیده مقاله:
Objective: This study aims to identify and analyze the key challenges of COVID-۱۹ pandemic crisis management in the education system of Khoy County.Methods and Materials: A mixed-methods design was employed, combining qualitative content analysis with quantitative survey analysis. In the qualitative phase, semi-structured interviews were conducted with ۲۴ stakeholders, including education administrators, crisis management officials, school principals, teachers, students, parents, and experts, until theoretical saturation was reached. Interview data were analyzed through open, axial, and selective coding using MAXQDA software. In the quantitative phase, a researcher-developed questionnaire was administered to ۳۸۴ respondents selected using Cochran’s formula. Face validity and reliability (Cronbach’s alpha) were confirmed. Quantitative data were analyzed using SPSS, with the Friedman ranking test applied to examine differences in the prioritization of crisis management challenges.Findings: The Friedman test results indicated no statistically significant difference among the identified crisis management challenges (χ² = ۵.۳۷۴, df = ۴, p = ۰.۲۵۱). Mean ranks showed minimal variation across dimensions, with educational inequality and the digital divide ranking highest (mean rank = ۳.۱۴) and psychological and social pressures ranking lowest (mean rank = ۲.۸۹). The lack of significant differences demonstrates that respondents perceived all crisis management challenges as uniformly critical, confirming the homogeneity and systemic nature of the problems rather than the dominance of any single dimension.Conclusion: The findings indicate that crisis management failure in the education system of Khoy County is systemic and structural, arising from the simultaneous interaction of managerial incapacity, infrastructural weaknesses, educational inequality, inefficiency of online education, and psychological pressures. The absence of differentiated priorities suggests that effective improvement requires comprehensive, integrated, and simultaneous interventions across all dimensions rather than fragmented or selective approaches. Objective: This study aims to identify and analyze the key challenges of COVID-۱۹ pandemic crisis management in the education system of Khoy County. Methods and Materials: A mixed-methods design was employed, combining qualitative content analysis with quantitative survey analysis. In the qualitative phase, semi-structured interviews were conducted with ۲۴ stakeholders, including education administrators, crisis management officials, school principals, teachers, students, parents, and experts, until theoretical saturation was reached. Interview data were analyzed through open, axial, and selective coding using MAXQDA software. In the quantitative phase, a researcher-developed questionnaire was administered to ۳۸۴ respondents selected using Cochran’s formula. Face validity and reliability (Cronbach’s alpha) were confirmed. Quantitative data were analyzed using SPSS, with the Friedman ranking test applied to examine differences in the prioritization of crisis management challenges. Findings: The Friedman test results indicated no statistically significant difference among the identified crisis management challenges (χ² = ۵.۳۷۴, df = ۴, p = ۰.۲۵۱). Mean ranks showed minimal variation across dimensions, with educational inequality and the digital divide ranking highest (mean rank = ۳.۱۴) and psychological and social pressures ranking lowest (mean rank = ۲.۸۹). The lack of significant differences demonstrates that respondents perceived all crisis management challenges as uniformly critical, confirming the homogeneity and systemic nature of the problems rather than the dominance of any single dimension. Conclusion: The findings indicate that crisis management failure in the education system of Khoy County is systemic and structural, arising from the simultaneous interaction of managerial incapacity, infrastructural weaknesses, educational inequality, inefficiency of online education, and psychological pressures. The absence of differentiated priorities suggests that effective improvement requires comprehensive, integrated, and simultaneous interventions across all dimensions rather than fragmented or selective approaches.
کلیدواژه ها:
مراجع و منابع این مقاله:
لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :