Genealogy of an Intellectual Duality: A Comparative Examination of the Characteristics of Traditional Islam and Religious Intellectualism
محل انتشار: مجله مطالعات اسلامی معاصر، دوره: 8، شماره: 2
سال انتشار: 1405
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 14
فایل این مقاله در 17 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد
- صدور گواهی نمایه سازی
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
JR_JCIS-8-2_011
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 13 خرداد 1405
چکیده مقاله:
This article provides a comparative analysis of the two major intellectual currents within the contemporary Islamic world: "Traditional Islam" and "Religious Intellectualism" (also known as Intellectual or Reformist Islam). Employing a descriptive-analytical methodology and documentary research, the study identifies and contrasts the core characteristics of these two competing paradigms. The findings reveal a fundamental dichotomy. Traditional Islam is characterized by its emphasis on preserving the classical heritage (Naqli sciences), textualism, and a conservative approach that often resists change and modern epistemological challenges. It prioritizes the transmission and interpretation of historical religious scholarship. In stark contrast, Religious Intellectualism centers on rationality, contemporary reinterpretation (ijtihad) of religious texts, constructive engagement with modern concepts, and the development of a coherent theological and philosophical system responsive to contemporary needs. The primary points of divergence lie in their respective attitudes toward reason ('aql), the authority of tradition (Sunnah), and modernity. Understanding this intellectual duality is essential for analyzing the socio-political and cultural transformations within Muslim-majority societies, from reform movements to social upheavals. The article argues that the future of Islamic thought hinges on the potential for a constructive dialogue and dynamic jurisprudence (ijtihad) that can bridge this gap. It concludes that while the differences are profound and rooted in opposing epistemologies, the path forward requires moving beyond rigid opposition towards a synthesis that respects textual authenticity while embracing a rational and contextually relevant hermeneutics to address the complex challenges of the modern world.
کلیدواژه ها:
نویسندگان
Ali Farsimadan
Department of Law and Jurisprudence, Faculty of Islamic Denominations, University of Religions and Denominations, Qom, Iran
Seyed Ali Ahrari
Department of Social Studies, Women and Family Studies Research Center, University of Religions and Denominations, Qom, Iran
Seyyed Ali Bathai
Department of Theological Schools, Faculty of Islamic Nations Studies, University of Religions and Denominations, Qom, Iran
مراجع و منابع این مقاله:
لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :