Tumor and Critical Organ Dose Assessment in Parotid Gland Radiotherapy: Comparison of Calculated and Measured Dose Using Different Techniques

سال انتشار: 1405
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 20

فایل این مقاله در 8 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_IJMP-23-1_001

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 13 خرداد 1405

چکیده مقاله:

Introduction: Parotid gland tumors account for approximately ۳% of head and neck malignancies. Surgery is the primary treatment modality, while postoperative radiotherapy is recommended for high-grade tumors to reduce local recurrence. Several radiotherapy techniques have been used for postoperative parotid irradiation, each with different dosimetric characteristics. Among the most common approaches are angled wedged photon beams and ipsilateral mixed photon–electron beams. This study aimed to compare commonly used parotid radiotherapy techniques dosimetrically and propose clinical optimization strategies.Material and Methods: A head-and-neck anthropomorphic Rando phantom was scanned using computed tomography with ۵-mm slice thickness. Imaging data were transferred to the Isogray treatment planning system (TPS). Target volume and organs at risk (OARs) were contoured, and thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) were used for dose measurements. Three radiotherapy techniques were evaluated regarding dose homogeneity, target coverage, organ sparing, and agreement between calculated and measured doses.Results: Wedged-pair photon techniques with and without multileaf collimator (MLC) showed better dose homogeneity within the planning target volume (PTV) than the mixed photon–electron technique (ΔD₅%–D₉₅%: ۲.۳۱ and ۲.۲۸ Gy vs ۶.۱۴ Gy). The MLC-based wedged-pair technique provided superior sparing of tissues beyond the target volume, while the mixed beam technique resulted in the lowest oral cavity dose (۱.۹ Gy). All techniques achieved at least ۹۵% PTV coverage. Measured and calculated doses showed acceptable agreement, although some discrepancies were observed in heterogeneous regions such as the mandible.Conclusion: No single radiotherapy technique was optimal for all dosimetric objectives. Combining techniques may improve normal tissue sparing while maintaining adequate and homogeneous tumor dose coverage.

نویسندگان

Mohammad Taghi Bahreyni Toossi

Medical Physics Research Centre, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

Hamid Gholamhosseinian

Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

Kazem Anvari

Department of Radiotherapy Oncology, Omid Hospital, Cancer Research Center, School of Medicine Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

Bahar Zargari

Student Research Committee, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran

Atefeh Vejdani Noghreiyan

Cancer Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, I.R.Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Yaparpalvi R, Fontenla DP, Tyerech SK, Boselli LR, Beitler JJ. ...
  • Utilization of Electronic Portal Imaging Device (EPID) For Setup Verification and Determination of Setup Margin in Head and Neck Radiation Therapy [مقاله ژورنالی]
  • Blasi O, Fontenot JD, Fields RS, Gibbons JP, Hogstrom KR. ...
  • Cozzi L, Fogliata A, Bolsi A, Nicolini G, Bernier J. ...
  • Soleymanifard S, Toossi MT, Khosroabadi M, Noghreiyan AV, Shahidsales S, ...
  • Kudchadker RJ, Hogstrom KR, Garden AS, McNeese MD, Boyd RA, ...
  • Nutting CM, Rowbottom CG, Cosgrove VP, Henk JM, Dearnaley DP, ...
  • Nutting CM, Morden JP, Harrington KJ, Urbano TG, Bhide SA, ...
  • Mali SB. Adaptive Radiotherapy for Head Neck Cancer. J Maxillofac ...
  • Emami B, Lyman J, Brown A, Coia L, Goitein M, ...
  • Bentzen SM, Constine LS, Deasy JO, Eisbruch A, Jackson A, ...
  • Bahreyni TMT, Gholamhosseinian H, Vejdani NA. Assessment of the Effects ...
  • Luo L. Extensive fade study of Harshaw LiF TLD materials. ...
  • Van Dyk J. QA of computerized radiation treatment planning systems. ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع