Using Artificial Chatbots as Academic Counselors; When Chatgpt Becomes an Academic Counselor (A Case Study of Chatgpt)
سال انتشار: 1405
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 117
فایل این مقاله در 8 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد
- صدور گواهی نمایه سازی
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
JR_JARCP-8-2_011
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 13 خرداد 1405
چکیده مقاله:
Objective: This research aimed to investigate the use of artificial intelligence chatbots, particularly ChatGPT, as academic counselors.Methods and Materials: A qualitative case study design was employed, involving ۱۰ unstructured interview sessions with ChatGPT across three iterative rounds of analysis. Comparative coding with a deductive approach was used to analyze ChatGPT’s responses to academic counseling scenarios.Findings: The findings revealed thirteen subthemes organized under two main themes: strengths and weaknesses. Strengths included providing multifaceted perspectives, suggesting resources, and generating effective study strategies, while weaknesses included a lack of empathy, personal opinion, and foresight.Conclusion: Although ChatGPT cannot replace professional counselors, results suggest it may function as a semi-professional academic counselor capable of delivering effective guidance in logical, non-emotional contexts. Validity was ensured by comparing ChatGPT’s responses with other AI chatbots, namely Perplexity, Gemini, and Copilot, and ensuring consistency across coding iterations. Objective: This research aimed to investigate the use of artificial intelligence chatbots, particularly ChatGPT, as academic counselors. Methods and Materials: A qualitative case study design was employed, involving ۱۰ unstructured interview sessions with ChatGPT across three iterative rounds of analysis. Comparative coding with a deductive approach was used to analyze ChatGPT’s responses to academic counseling scenarios. Findings: The findings revealed thirteen subthemes organized under two main themes: strengths and weaknesses. Strengths included providing multifaceted perspectives, suggesting resources, and generating effective study strategies, while weaknesses included a lack of empathy, personal opinion, and foresight. Conclusion: Although ChatGPT cannot replace professional counselors, results suggest it may function as a semi-professional academic counselor capable of delivering effective guidance in logical, non-emotional contexts. Validity was ensured by comparing ChatGPT’s responses with other AI chatbots, namely Perplexity, Gemini, and Copilot, and ensuring consistency across coding iterations.
کلیدواژه ها:
مراجع و منابع این مقاله:
لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :