Detecting Post-Traumatic Stress Risk via ML Analysis of Dissociative Tendencies and Arousal Dysregulation

سال انتشار: 1405
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 11

فایل این مقاله در 11 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JARCP-8-2_021

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 13 خرداد 1405

چکیده مقاله:

Objective: To evaluate the predictive utility of machine learning models in detecting post-traumatic stress risk by analyzing the complex interplay between dissociative tendencies and physiological arousal markers.Methods and Materials: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted with a sample of N=۱,۲۴۵ adult participants from the USA with documented trauma exposure. Data collection utilized the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist (PCL), the Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES), subjective hyperarousal scales, and wearable biometric sensors capturing electrodermal activity and heart rate variability during a standardized stress-reactivity paradigm. Extreme Gradient Boosting, Random Forest, and Support Vector Machine algorithms were trained and evaluated using stratified ten-fold cross-validation. Findings: The Extreme Gradient Boosting model demonstrated superior predictive performance, achieving an AUC=۰.۹۱, which significantly outperformed the Random Forest (AUC=۰.۸۸) and Support Vector Machine (AUC=۰.۸۲) models. Feature importance analysis revealed that derealization (۲۲.۴%), depersonalization (۱۸.۱%), and low heart rate variability during recovery (۱۵.۳%) were the most critical predictors of post-traumatic stress risk. Furthermore, a significant non-linear interaction demonstrated that objective physiological arousal strongly predicted risk primarily in highly dissociative individuals who underreported subjective distress. Conclusion: Machine learning models integrating objective physiological data with subjective dissociative measures offer a powerful, highly sensitive approach for detecting hidden post-traumatic stress risk. Objective: To evaluate the predictive utility of machine learning models in detecting post-traumatic stress risk by analyzing the complex interplay between dissociative tendencies and physiological arousal markers. Methods and Materials: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted with a sample of N=۱,۲۴۵ adult participants from the USA with documented trauma exposure. Data collection utilized the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist (PCL), the Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES), subjective hyperarousal scales, and wearable biometric sensors capturing electrodermal activity and heart rate variability during a standardized stress-reactivity paradigm. Extreme Gradient Boosting, Random Forest, and Support Vector Machine algorithms were trained and evaluated using stratified ten-fold cross-validation. Findings: The Extreme Gradient Boosting model demonstrated superior predictive performance, achieving an AUC=۰.۹۱, which significantly outperformed the Random Forest (AUC=۰.۸۸) and Support Vector Machine (AUC=۰.۸۲) models. Feature importance analysis revealed that derealization (۲۲.۴%), depersonalization (۱۸.۱%), and low heart rate variability during recovery (۱۵.۳%) were the most critical predictors of post-traumatic stress risk. Furthermore, a significant non-linear interaction demonstrated that objective physiological arousal strongly predicted risk primarily in highly dissociative individuals who underreported subjective distress. Conclusion: Machine learning models integrating objective physiological data with subjective dissociative measures offer a powerful, highly sensitive approach for detecting hidden post-traumatic stress risk.

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Akay, G., Koç, E. S., & Oğuzhan, H. (2026). Examination ...
  • Atarod, N., Borjali, A., Sohrabi, F., & Basharpoor, S. (2016). ...
  • Boelen, P. A., van de Schoot, R., van den Hout, ...
  • Danböck, S. K. (2023). Psychometric Properties of the Dissociative Subtype ...
  • Dimitrova, L. I., Fernando, V., Vissia, E. M., Nijenhuis, E. ...
  • Hamer, R., Bestel, N., & Mackelprang, J. L. (2024). Dissociative ...
  • Jozan, A., Fardin, M., & Sanaguye Moharer, G. (2021). The ...
  • McNally, R. J. (2013). Posttraumatic stress disorder and dissociative disorders. ...
  • Muhammad, S., & Abdullahi, T. (2025). Post-Traumatic Stress and Academic ...
  • Ouimette, P., Read, J., & Brown, P. J. (2005). Consistency ...
  • Perlick, D. A., Sautter, Frederic J, ecker-Cretu, Julia J, Schultz, ...
  • Ratcliff, J. J., Miller, A. K., Monheim, C. L., & ...
  • Read, J. P., Colder, C. R., Merrill, J. E., Ouimette, ...
  • Sadeghi, K., Goodarzi, G., & Foroughi, A. (2023). Recovering from ...
  • Sheikh, W. G. E., Abou‐Abbass, H., Bizri, M., Tamim, H., ...
  • Trivedi, G. Y., & Thakore, P. (2025). A Case Study ...
  • Vadakkedath, R., & Thomas, S. S. (2025). Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder ...
  • Veronese, G., Mahamid, F., & Bdier, D. (2025). Traumatic Grief, ...
  • Watts, J. R., Lazzareschi, N. R., Warwick, L. A., & ...
  • Ye, T., Huang, Y., Chen, Y., Ni, Y., Zhang, X., ...
  • Ye, Y., Xie, Q., Sun, Y., Xu, J., Cheng, L., ...
  • Zhang, L., Wu, X., Liu, M., & Liu, A. (2025). ...
  • Zhao, S. (2025). Relationship Between Purposeful Rumination and Post-Traumatic Growth ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع