The Dialectics of Enlightenment and Its Discontents

On a broad scale, The Dialectic of Enlightenment re-conceptualizes the concept of enlightenment and its close association to mythical thinking. Through the meaning of Myth, Horkheimer and Adorno sought to challenge the mainstream meaning of enlightenment. However, why did The Enlightenment fall into the trap of mythical thinking again? Why does mythical thinking persist despite the ongoing progress of The Enlightenment ? The myth semantically includes a twofold connotation: the genre, and the dark side of rationality. The Enlightenment has a mythological foundation that manifests itself in control, exploitation, and destruction tendencies. The power-knowledge relations are foregrounded as long as the overcoming of fear is resolved. Additionally, rationality is reduced to a control instrument and a monopoly of power. This paper thus focuses on the significance of the authors' criticism of the hidden agenda of the Enlightenment. It also addresses the paradox and dialectical aspect of myth and enlightenment within the historical and sociopsychological framework. The study demonstrates the discrepancy between the edefinition of myth referred to in the arguement and F. W. J. Schilling's framework of thought, which is not explicitlymentioned in the text. The key findings are the contradiction between rationality and its outcome as a counterproductive force. The progress in human civilisation results in the self-reversion toward the myths. The Enlightenment was not thus the antithesis of myth, but a sub-category of myth.

کلیدواژه ها:

The Enlightenment ، rationality ، Barbarity ، Reversal ، Myth