Outcomes of Temple Filler Injections in Facial Rejuvenation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
سال انتشار: 1405
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 87
فایل این مقاله در 10 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد
- صدور گواهی نمایه سازی
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
JR_MPHRJ-2-2_003
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 23 فروردین 1405
چکیده مقاله:
Temple volumization has become an integral component of facial rejuvenation, aiming to restore youthful contours and address age-related soft tissue loss. Despite the increasing use of dermal fillers in the temporal region, variability exists regarding filler type, injection depth, technique, and clinical outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction associated with temple filler injections. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases from January ۲۰۰۰ to December ۲۰۲۵. Studies reporting on outcomes of hyaluronic acid (HA), poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA), and calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA) in temple rejuvenation were included. Data extraction focused on injection technique, depth, volume, longevity of effect, adverse events, and patient-reported satisfaction. A total of ۶۶ studies encompassing ۳,۲۱۴ patients met inclusion criteria. Meta-analytic pooling demonstrated significant improvement in temporal volume restoration with HA, PLLA, and CaHA, with standardized mean differences (SMD) of ۱.۱۲ (۹۵% CI: ۰.۸۵–۱.۳۹), ۱.۰۵ (۹۵% CI: ۰.۷۷–۱.۳۲), and ۰.۹۸ (۹۵% CI: ۰.۷۰–۱.۲۶), respectively. Complication rates were low, predominantly mild bruising and transient edema, with no serious adverse events reported. Patient satisfaction scores were consistently high, with pooled satisfaction rates exceeding ۹۰% across all filler types. Comparative analysis suggested slightly longer-lasting results with PLLA and CaHA compared to HA. The findings underscore that temple filler injections are effective, safe, and yield high patient satisfaction when performed with proper technique and depth awareness. Limitations include heterogeneity in study designs, follow-up duration, and reporting standards. Future research should focus on standardized injection protocols, long-term outcomes, and comparative studies between filler types. Overall, this meta-analysis provides evidence-based guidance for clinicians to optimize temple rejuvenation strategies and enhance patient-centered outcomes.
کلیدواژه ها:
نویسندگان
Aida Sadeghzadeh
Master&#۰۳۹;s Degree in Architecture, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran
مراجع و منابع این مقاله:
لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :