Comparative Foreign Policies of Iran and Turkey in Iraq and Their Impact on Regional Balance (۲۰۰۳–۲۰۱۹)

سال انتشار: 1405
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 7

فایل این مقاله در 17 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_ISSLP-5-1_014

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 22 فروردین 1405

چکیده مقاله:

This article examines the comparative foreign policies of Iran and Turkey in Iraq between ۲۰۰۳ and ۲۰۱۹, focusing on their strategic objectives, instruments of influence, and implications for regional balance. Following the collapse of Saddam Hussein’s regime, Iraq emerged as a pivotal arena for geopolitical competition, where both Tehran and Ankara have sought to expand their spheres of influence. The study employs a theoretical framework combining offensive realism, balance of power theory, and regional security complex theory to explore the motivations and mechanisms underpinning each state's approach. Iran has pursued a strategy centered on constructing a Shia corridor, enhancing regional deterrence through proxy militias, and curbing U.S. influence. It has leveraged the Popular Mobilization Units, the Quds Force, religious diplomacy, and economic interdependence to assert dominance, particularly in Shia-majority areas. In contrast, Turkey has prioritized the Kurdish question, Turkmen advocacy, water security, and economic expansion. Its engagement with the Kurdistan Regional Government through trade and energy diplomacy, combined with a proactive military posture against the PKK, reflects a multidimensional approach to influence northern Iraq. The article also analyzes how both countries have employed soft power tools, such as religious networks and cultural outreach, and evaluates their impact on Iraq’s political elite and post-ISIS stabilization efforts. A comparative analysis reveals significant divergence in military and religious strategies, yet occasional convergence in opposing Kurdish separatism. The study concludes that the Iran–Turkey rivalry in Iraq is emblematic of a broader contest for regional leadership and that Iraq's internal fragmentation and institutional weakness have made it susceptible to external domination. This rivalry has shaped not only Iraq’s domestic order but also regional alignments involving the Gulf states, the United States, and Russia, making Iraq a microcosm of Middle Eastern geopolitical dynamics.This article examines the comparative foreign policies of Iran and Turkey in Iraq between ۲۰۰۳ and ۲۰۱۹, focusing on their strategic objectives, instruments of influence, and implications for regional balance. Following the collapse of Saddam Hussein’s regime, Iraq emerged as a pivotal arena for geopolitical competition, where both Tehran and Ankara have sought to expand their spheres of influence. The study employs a theoretical framework combining offensive realism, balance of power theory, and regional security complex theory to explore the motivations and mechanisms underpinning each state's approach. Iran has pursued a strategy centered on constructing a Shia corridor, enhancing regional deterrence through proxy militias, and curbing U.S. influence. It has leveraged the Popular Mobilization Units, the Quds Force, religious diplomacy, and economic interdependence to assert dominance, particularly in Shia-majority areas. In contrast, Turkey has prioritized the Kurdish question, Turkmen advocacy, water security, and economic expansion. Its engagement with the Kurdistan Regional Government through trade and energy diplomacy, combined with a proactive military posture against the PKK, reflects a multidimensional approach to influence northern Iraq. The article also analyzes how both countries have employed soft power tools, such as religious networks and cultural outreach, and evaluates their impact on Iraq’s political elite and post-ISIS stabilization efforts. A comparative analysis reveals significant divergence in military and religious strategies, yet occasional convergence in opposing Kurdish separatism. The study concludes that the Iran–Turkey rivalry in Iraq is emblematic of a broader contest for regional leadership and that Iraq's internal fragmentation and institutional weakness have made it susceptible to external domination. This rivalry has shaped not only Iraq’s domestic order but also regional alignments involving the Gulf states, the United States, and Russia, making Iraq a microcosm of Middle Eastern geopolitical dynamics.

نویسندگان

Ashoor Savari Pour

Department of Political Science and International Relations, Qo.C., Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran

Davood Kiani

Department of Political Science and International Relations, SR.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Mehdi Javdani Moghadam

Department of Political Science and International Relations, Imam Sadiq University, Tehran, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Ahmadian, H., & Mohseni, P. (2021). From détente to containment: ...
  • Ali, O. (2017). İran ve Barzani: kötüleşen ilişkiler ve kaçınılmaz ...
  • Anadolu, A. (2020). Iraqi lawmakers approve Mustafa al-Kadhimi's government. https://www.aa.com.tr/en/middle-east/iraqi-lawmakers-approve-mustafa-al-kadhimis-government/1831935 ...
  • Arcak, S. (2012). Gifts in Motion: Ottoman–Safavid Cultural Exchange, 1501–1618 ...
  • Arfa, H. (1964). Under Five Shahs. John Murray. ...
  • Ari, T. (2004). Irak, Iran ve ABD: önleyici savaş, petrol ...
  • Askarieh, M. (2008). A Case for Sustainable Development of Nuclear ...
  • Atlantic, C. (2021). Iran’s allies lost seats in the Iraqi ...
  • Aygün, F. T. (2021). Al-Kadhimi’s quest for balance in foreign ...
  • Azad, N. (2015). Barzani Körfez ülkelerinde Bağımsız Kürdistan’a destek arıyor. ...
  • Azizi, H. (2021). Challenges to Iran’s role in Iraq in ...
  • Azizi, H., & Cevik, S. (2022). Turkish and Iranian Involvement ...
  • Balc, A. (2015). Türkiye’nin Irak siyaseti: 2015 yılına dair bir ...
  • Barzani, M. (2017). Exclusive: No turning back on independence vote, ...
  • Barzegar, I. (2014). Kodami: Kurdistan rehberan-ı İran’ı mı tersaned? http://www.bbc.com/persian/iran/2014/08/140810_120_jb_kurdistan ...
  • Barzegar, K. (2005). [Title not provided]. Journal of Science and ...
  • Barzegar, K. (2008). Iran, New Iraq and the Persian Gulf ...
  • Barzegar, K. (2008). Stephen Walt on the U.S., Iran, and ...
  • Cankaya, A. (1969). Yeni Mülkiye Tarihi ve Mülkiyeliler. Mars Matbaası. ...
  • Davutoğlu, A. (2008). Turkey–EU Relations: An Asset for Regional and ...
  • Ehteshami, A. (2003). Iran–Iraq relations after Saddam. The Washington Quarterly, ...
  • Gunter, M. M. (2011a). Arab–Kurdish relations and the future of ...
  • Gunter, M. M. (2011b). The Five Stages of American Foreign ...
  • Hawramy, F. (2017). Referendum on independent Kurdistan puts Iran at ...
  • Inat, K. (2018). Türkiye–Irak ilişkilerinde terör sorunu. https://www.setav.org/turkiye-irak-iliskilerinde-teror-sorunu ...
  • Kagan, R. (1998). Saddam’s Impending Victory. 22-22. ...
  • Kardaş, T., & Yeşiltaş, M. (2017). Non-state Armed Actors in ...
  • Keynoush, B. (2016). Saudi Arabia and Iran: Friends or Foes? ...
  • Koç, M. (2017). IKBY’nin referandum kararının İran’daki yansımaları. https://iramcenter.org/ikbynin-referandum-kararinin-irandaki-yansimalar/ ...
  • Maleki, A. (2006). Extremism in Islamic Shi‘ite’s Faith. In T. ...
  • Mustafa, H. A. (2016). Sistani and Saudi Arabia: Relations to ...
  • Powell, C. (1996). Frontline: The Gulf War. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/gulf/oral/decision.html ...
  • Rezaei, F. (2019). Iran’s Foreign Policy After the Nuclear Agreement: ...
  • Salihi, E. (2017). Irak: Devletin Çöküşü ve Atışma Süreci. Kaknüs ...
  • Salim, M., & El-Ghobashy, T. (2019). By granting rare audience, ...
  • Sinkaya, B. (2014). Deepening of strategic partnership between Iraq and ...
  • Sputnik, N. (2017). Kuzey Irak’taki referandum, Ortadoğu haritasını ne şekilde ...
  • Tabatabai, A., & Esfandiary, D. (2017). Cooperating with Iran to ...
  • Tamer, C. (2016). Türkiye ve İran’ın Irak’ta güç tahkim etme ...
  • Uluç, L. (2017). Onaltına Yüzyıl Osmanlı–Safevi Kültürel İlişkileri Çerçevesinde Nakkaşhanenin ...
  • Ulutaş, U. (2016). Şii siyasetinde Sadr faktörü. https://www.aksam.com.tr/ufuk-ulutas/yazarlar/sii-siyasetinde-sadr-faktoru/haber-513556 ...
  • Uzman, H. O., & Balcı, C. (2017). Bölgesel açıdan Kuzey ...
  • Zonis, M. (1990). Mohammed Reza Pahlavi. In B. Reich (Ed.), ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع