A Comparative Study of Pharmaceutical Sanctions in International Law and Islamic Norms
سال انتشار: 1405
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 12
فایل این مقاله در 14 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد
- صدور گواهی نمایه سازی
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
JR_ISSLP-5-1_022
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 22 فروردین 1405
چکیده مقاله:
International sanctions against countries, by restricting access to medicines and medical equipment, violate public health and fundamental human rights. Using a descriptive–analytical method and relying on international legal instruments (such as the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights) and Islamic sources (the Qur'an, hadiths, and jurisprudence), this study examines the comparative impact of pharmaceutical sanctions on health systems and their conflict with legal and ethical principles. The findings indicate that sanctions not only contradict the right to health under international law but also oppose Islamic norms such as preserving human dignity and the obligation of treatment in emergencies. Empirical cases in Iran, Iraq, and Syria confirm the increase in mortality among patients with specific conditions, shortages of essential medicines, and price inflation. This study, by offering solutions such as humanitarian exemptions and strengthening regional cooperation, emphasizes the necessity of revising sanction mechanisms to reduce human harm.International sanctions against countries, by restricting access to medicines and medical equipment, violate public health and fundamental human rights. Using a descriptive–analytical method and relying on international legal instruments (such as the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights) and Islamic sources (the Qur'an, hadiths, and jurisprudence), this study examines the comparative impact of pharmaceutical sanctions on health systems and their conflict with legal and ethical principles. The findings indicate that sanctions not only contradict the right to health under international law but also oppose Islamic norms such as preserving human dignity and the obligation of treatment in emergencies. Empirical cases in Iran, Iraq, and Syria confirm the increase in mortality among patients with specific conditions, shortages of essential medicines, and price inflation. This study, by offering solutions such as humanitarian exemptions and strengthening regional cooperation, emphasizes the necessity of revising sanction mechanisms to reduce human harm.
کلیدواژه ها:
نویسندگان
Asal Asadpour
Department of Law, KI.C , Islamic Azad University, Kish Island, Iran.
Heydar Ali Jahanbakhshi
Department of Theology and Islamic Studies (Jurisprudence and Law), Isl.C. , Islamic Azad University, Iran.
Nazafarin Nazemi
Department of International Law, Shi.C. , Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran.
مراجع و منابع این مقاله:
لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :