Cross-linguistic Influence (CLI) in Multilingual Learners: Implications for Education

سال انتشار: 1404
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 23

فایل این مقاله در 7 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_IJREL-2-2_003

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 4 اسفند 1404

چکیده مقاله:

As multilingualism becomes increasingly prevalent in globalized societies, understanding the cognitive and linguistic mechanisms underpinning language acquisition is essential. This study explores cross – linguistic influence (CLI) in multilingual learners from a theoretical perspective, emphasizing its implications for linguistic theory and educational practice. Drawing upon key frameworks such as Dynamic Systems Theory, the Scalpel Model, and Multicompetence, the paper critically examines how CLI operates across multiple linguistic domains and within complex learner ecologies. Particular attention is paid to factors mediating CLI – such as language typology, proficiency, language dominance, and acquisition context – and how these factors shape multilingual development in both predictable and variable ways. The article argues for a reconceptualization of CLI not as a source of interference, but as a fundamental aspect of multilingual competence that reflects the dynamic interconnectivity of linguistic systems. The findings support a shift away from monolingual instructional models toward pedagogies that recognize and leverage the linguistic resources of multilingual learners. This theoretical inquiry lays the groundwork for future empirical research and provides valuable insights for linguistic, educators, and policymakers in the multilingual education landscape. CLI should be seen not as a hindrance but as a valuable resource, offering multilingual learners cognitive flexibility and enhanced language proficiencyAs multilingualism becomes increasingly prevalent in globalized societies, understanding the cognitive and linguistic mechanisms underpinning language acquisition is essential. This study explores cross – linguistic influence (CLI) in multilingual learners from a theoretical perspective, emphasizing its implications for linguistic theory and educational practice. Drawing upon key frameworks such as Dynamic Systems Theory, the Scalpel Model, and Multicompetence, the paper critically examines how CLI operates across multiple linguistic domains and within complex learner ecologies. Particular attention is paid to factors mediating CLI – such as language typology, proficiency, language dominance, and acquisition context – and how these factors shape multilingual development in both predictable and variable ways. The article argues for a reconceptualization of CLI not as a source of interference, but as a fundamental aspect of multilingual competence that reflects the dynamic interconnectivity of linguistic systems. The findings support a shift away from monolingual instructional models toward pedagogies that recognize and leverage the linguistic resources of multilingual learners. This theoretical inquiry lays the groundwork for future empirical research and provides valuable insights for linguistic, educators, and policymakers in the multilingual education landscape. CLI should be seen not as a hindrance but as a valuable resource, offering multilingual learners cognitive flexibility and enhanced language proficiency

نویسندگان

Fariba Naderi

Master’s degree graduate, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • • Aronin, L., & Singleton, D. (2012). Multilingualism. John Benjamins ...
  • • Bialystok, E. (2009). Bilingualism: The good, the bad, and ...
  • • Cenoz, J. (2013). The influence of bilingualism on third ...
  • • Cook, V. (1992). Evidence for multicompetence. Language Learning, 42(4), ...
  • • Cummins, J. (2007). The relationship between language proficiency and ...
  • • De Angelis, G. (2007). Third or additional language acquisition. ...
  • • De Bot, K. (1992). A bilingual production model: Levelt’s ...
  • • Flynn, S., Foley, C., & Vinnitskaya, I. (2004). The ...
  • • Grosjean, F. (2010). Bilingual: Life and reality. Harvard University ...
  • • Herdina, P., & Jessner, U. (2002). A dynamic model ...
  • • Jarvis, S., & Pavlenko, A. (2008). Crosslinguistic influence in ...
  • • Jessner, U. (2008). Teaching third languages: Findings and challenges. ...
  • • Kroll, J. F., & Bialystok, E. (2013). Understanding the ...
  • • Larsen – Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008). Complex ...
  • • Odlin, T. (1989). Language transfer: Cross-linguistic influence in language ...
  • • Ortega, L. (2009). Understanding second language acquisition. Hodder Education. ...
  • • Rothman, J. (2010). On the typology of transfer. Bilingualism: ...
  • • Schmid, M. S., & Köpke, B. (2017). First language ...
  • • Slabakova, R. (2016). The scalpel model of third language ...
  • • Williams, S., & Hammarberg, B. (1998). Language switches in ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع