An Investigation of Iranian EFL Teachers’ Self-efficacy and Adversity Quotient in Online versus In-Person Classes

سال انتشار: 1405
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 41

نسخه کامل این مقاله ارائه نشده است و در دسترس نمی باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_LART-11-1_006

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 30 بهمن 1404

چکیده مقاله:

Two main factors enumerated as effective in teaching success and learning achievement are teaches’ self-efficacy and adversity quoatient (AQ).With respect to the recent global shift to online teaching and learning in different educational settings, the present study was planned to explore any significant difference between Iranian EFL teachers’ self-efficacy and AQ in online and in-person classes.The participants, selected based on purposive convenience sampling, comprised ۱۵۰ male and female EFL teachers who were B.A. or M.A. holders. Fifty-seven of these teachers were mainly involved in in-person classes while ۹۳ teachers mostly dealth with online teaching. Initially, the researchers sent them the Bar-On’s (۱۹۹۷) emotional quotient inventory to provide assurance for the homogeneity of the two groups in this regard. Near the end of the term, when they were fully involved in either online or in-person teaching, both groups received the AQ profile and teacher’s sense of self-efficacy scale to respond attentively.The collected data was analyzed and the results of the independent samples t-test revealed a significant difference between teachers’ self-efficacy and AQ with the online group outperforming the in-person group.These findings suggest that the challenges of teaching online can contribute to enhancing EFL teachers’ AQ and self-efficacy.Two main factors enumerated as effective in teaching success and learning achievement are teaches’ self-efficacy and adversity quoatient (AQ).With respect to the recent global shift to online teaching and learning in different educational settings, the present study was planned to explore any significant difference between Iranian EFL teachers’ self-efficacy and AQ in online and in-person classes.The participants, selected based on purposive convenience sampling, comprised ۱۵۰ male and female EFL teachers who were B.A. or M.A. holders. Fifty-seven of these teachers were mainly involved in in-person classes while ۹۳ teachers mostly dealth with online teaching. Initially, the researchers sent them the Bar-On’s (۱۹۹۷) emotional quotient inventory to provide assurance for the homogeneity of the two groups in this regard. Near the end of the term, when they were fully involved in either online or in-person teaching, both groups received the AQ profile and teacher’s sense of self-efficacy scale to respond attentively.The collected data was analyzed and the results of the independent samples t-test revealed a significant difference between teachers’ self-efficacy and AQ with the online group outperforming the in-person group.These findings suggest that the challenges of teaching online can contribute to enhancing EFL teachers’ AQ and self-efficacy.

کلیدواژه ها:

Bar-On Emotional Quotient Inventory (EQ-I) ، Self-Efficacy ، Emotional-Quotient Inventory ، In-person classes ، Online classes

نویسندگان

Andisheh Saniei

Assistant Professor, Department of English Language Teaching, Ro.C., Islamic Azad University, Roudehen, Iran

Somaye Panahkhahi

MA Graduate, ELT Department, ST. C, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Akbari, R., & Moradkhani, S. (2010). Iranian english teachers’ self-efficacy: ...
  • Alibakhshi, G. (2011). On the impacts of gender and personality ...
  • Allinder, R. M. (1994).The relationship between efficacy and the instructional ...
  • Almajali, D., & Al-Lozi, M. (2016). Determinants of the actual ...
  • Anderson, R. N., Greene, M. L., & Loewen, P. S. ...
  • Ary, D., Jacobe, L. Ch., & Walker, D. A. (2019). ...
  • Bakare, B. M. (2013). Students’ adversity quotient and related factors ...
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral ...
  • Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development functioning. Educational ...
  • Bandura, A. (2002). Social foundations of thought and action. In ...
  • Barni, D., Danioni, F., & Benevene, P. (2019). Teachers’ self-efficacy: ...
  • Bar-On, R. (1997).The Emotional Quotient Inventory(EQ-i): Technical manual. Toronto, Canada: ...
  • Bar-On, R. (2005). The Bar-On model of emotional-social intelligence (ESI). ...
  • Baroudi, S., & Shaya, N. (2022).Exploring predictors of teachers’ self-efficacy ...
  • Berman, P., McLaughlin, M., Bass, G., Pauly, E., & Zellman, ...
  • Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. L. (2015).Self-regulated learning strategies & ...
  • Cando, J. M. D., & Villacastin, L. N. (2014).The relationship ...
  • Canivel, L. (2010). AQ and leadership style, performance and best ...
  • Chan, D. W. (2008). General, collective, and domain-specific teacher self-efficacy ...
  • Cornista, G. A., & Macasaet, C. J. (2013). Adversity Quotient ...
  • Cousins, J. B., & Walker, C. A. (2000).Predictors of educators’ ...
  • Dewaele, J. M., Albakistani, A., & Ahmed, I. K. (2022).Levels ...
  • Dorji, R., & Singh, K. (2019). Role of adversity quotient ...
  • Evans, E. D., &Tribble, M. (1986).Perceived teaching problems, self-efficacy and ...
  • Freeman, D. (2002). The hidden side of the work: Teacher ...
  • Gacs, A., Goertler, S., & Spasova, S. (2020).Planned online language ...
  • Goddard, R. D., Hoy, W. K., & Hoy, A. W. ...
  • Grandy, J. (2009). Psychometric properties and analysis of the AQ ...
  • Guskey, T. R., & Passaro, P. D. (1994).Teacher efficacy: A ...
  • Heidari, F., Nourmohammadi, E., &Nowrouzi, H. (2012).On the relationship between ...
  • Hone, K., Liu, X., &Tarhini, T. (2016).Examining the moderating effect ...
  • Horton, W. (2011). E-learning by design. John Wiley & Sons. ...
  • Horvitz, B. S., Beach, A. L., Anderson, M. L., & ...
  • Jackson, Ch. (2018).Relationships between job satisfaction, organizational commitment and teacher ...
  • Jimenez, E. (2021).Adversity and emotional quotients of public elementary school ...
  • Kuong, H. C. (2015). Enhancing online learning experience: From learners’ ...
  • Lantz-Andersson, A., Lundin, M., &Selwyn.N. (2018). Twenty years of online ...
  • Lassoued, Z., Alhendawi, M., & Bashitialshaaer, R. (2020).An exploratory study ...
  • Marashi, H., & Azizi-Nassab, F. (2018).EFL teachers’ language proficiency, classroom ...
  • Marashi, H., & Naghibi, Z. (2020). Adversity quotient and classroom ...
  • Marashi, H., & Rashidian, S. (2018).EFL teachers’ adversity quotient, personal ...
  • Maureen, M. (2015). The level of adversity quotient and social ...
  • McIver, E. C. (2014). Examination of the relationship between school ...
  • Midgley, C., Feldlaufer, H., & Eccles, J. S. (1989).Change in ...
  • Moafian, F., & Ghanizadeh, A. (2009).The relationship between Iranian EFL ...
  • Moafian, F., & Pishghadam, R. (2009). Construct validation of a ...
  • Moore, W. P., & Esselman, M. E. (1992). Teacher Efficacy, ...
  • Moradkhani, S., & Haghi, S. (2017). Context-based sources of EFL ...
  • Moradkhani, S., Raygan, A., & Moein, M. S. (2017). Iranian ...
  • Mwivanda, M., & Kingi, P. M. (2019).Teachers’ adversity quotient dimension ...
  • Nikam, V., & Uplane, M. (2013).Adversity quotient and defense mechanism ...
  • Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual (7thed).McGraw-Hill Education. ...
  • Parvathy, U., & Praseeda, M. (2014).Relationship between adversity quotient and ...
  • Phoolka, Sh., & Kaur, N. (2012). Adversity quotient: A new ...
  • Poulou, M. S., Reddy, L. A., & Dudek, C. M. ...
  • Praditsang, M., & Hanafi, Z. (2013). Relationship between adversity quotient ...
  • Racheva, V. (2018). Social aspects of synchronous virtual learning environments. ...
  • Rastegar, M., & Memarpour, S. (2009).The relationship between emotional intelligence ...
  • Resnik, P., & Dewaele, J. M. (2021). Learner emotions, autonomy ...
  • Resnik, P., Dewaele, J. M., & Knechtelsdorfer, E. (2022). Differences ...
  • Robitschek, C. (1998). Personal growth initiative: The construct and its ...
  • Ross, J. A. (1992).Teacher efficacy and the effects of coaching ...
  • Sahragard, R., & Baharloo, A. (2009). Fear of success, imposter ...
  • Singh, S., & Sharma, T. (2017).Effect of adversity quotient on ...
  • Stein, M. K., & Wang, M. C. (1988). Teacher development ...
  • Stoltz, P. G. (1997).Adversity quotient: Turning obstacles into opportunities. New ...
  • Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W. A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing ...
  • Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W. A. (2002).The differential antecedents ofelf-efficacy ...
  • Tuchman, E., & Isaacs, J. (2011).The influence of formal and ...
  • Villaver, E. (2005).The adversity quotient levels of female grade schoolteachers ...
  • Vinas, D. D., & Malabanan, M.G. (2015). Adversity Quotient and ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع