Judicial Loss in Iran 's Legal System
سال انتشار: 1403
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 22
فایل این مقاله در 5 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد
- صدور گواهی نمایه سازی
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
JR_LAW-2-1_007
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 19 بهمن 1404
چکیده مقاله:
Judicial loss is a legal concept of a hypothetical nature that, upon realization, fundamentally transforms the effects of a contract. Judicial loss occurs in cases where the property has not been physically or materially destroyed but cannot be returned in its original form due to inaccessibility. In civil law, claims for equivalent property or monetary value are possible only when the property is genuinely lost, and access to its original form is impossible. Articles ۳۱۱ and ۳۲۳ of the Civil Code, in the context of usurpation, address this issue.In certain court rulings, the concept of judicial loss has been expanded to include instances such as changes in the nature of the property, its transfer to another person via an official deed, or the inaccessibility of the property. These differing interpretations and extensions of judicial loss have led to varying judicial practices in recognizing and applying this concept. This article examines the concept of judicial loss by drawing on jurisprudential and legal principles, with an emphasis on achieving unified judicial practices and preventing conflicting rulings.Judicial loss is a legal concept of a hypothetical nature that, upon realization, fundamentally transforms the effects of a contract. Judicial loss occurs in cases where the property has not been physically or materially destroyed but cannot be returned in its original form due to inaccessibility. In civil law, claims for equivalent property or monetary value are possible only when the property is genuinely lost, and access to its original form is impossible. Articles ۳۱۱ and ۳۲۳ of the Civil Code, in the context of usurpation, address this issue. In certain court rulings, the concept of judicial loss has been expanded to include instances such as changes in the nature of the property, its transfer to another person via an official deed, or the inaccessibility of the property. These differing interpretations and extensions of judicial loss have led to varying judicial practices in recognizing and applying this concept. This article examines the concept of judicial loss by drawing on jurisprudential and legal principles, with an emphasis on achieving unified judicial practices and preventing conflicting rulings.
کلیدواژه ها:
Restitution of Property ، Confiscated Property ، Unauthorized Transactions ، ، Judicial Loss ، Legal Practice ، Nullification of Official Deeds
نویسندگان
Zahra Mazhari
Phd Student private law,Semnan,Islamic University Azad ,Semnan,Iran.
Bahman Babajanian
Assistant Professor of the Department of Law,Islamic University Azad ,Semnan,Iran